Back

Transcriptome profiling of human colonic cells exposed to the gut pathobiont Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus.

Pasquereau-Kotula, E.; du Merle, L.; Sismeiro, O.; Pietrosemoli, N.; Varet, H.; Legendre, R.; Trieu-Cuot, P.; Dramsi, S.

2023-05-16 microbiology
10.1101/2023.05.16.540927 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Streptococcus gallolyticus sp. gallolyticus (SGG) is a gut pathobiont involved in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). To decipher the contribution of SGG in tumor initiation and/or acceleration respectively, a global transcriptome was performed in normal colonic cells (FHC) and in tumoral colonic cells (HT29). To identify SGG-specific alterations, we chose the phylogenetically closest relative, Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. macedonicus (SGM) as the control bacterium. We show that SGM, a bacterium generally considered as safe, did not induce any transcriptional changes on the two human colonic cells. The transcriptional reprogramming induced by SGG was significantly different in FHC and HT29 cells, with most of the up- and down-regulated genes associated with cancer disease. Top up-regulated genes related to cancer were: (i) IL-20, CLK1, SORBS2, ERG1, PIM1, SNORD3A for normal FHC cells and (ii) TSLP, BHLHA15, LAMP3, ZNF27B, KRT17, ATF3 for cancerous HT29 cells. SGG induces much stronger transcriptional changes in cancerous than in normal colonic cells (2,090 vs 128 genes being affected, respectively). Gene set enrichment analysis reveals that SGG-induced strong ER- (endoplasmic reticulum) stress and UPR- (unfolded protein response) activation in colonic epithelial cells. Our results suggest that SGG induces a pro-tumoral shift in human colonic cells, particularly in transformed cells potentially accelerating tumor development in the colon.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.