Evidence that ultrafast non-quantal transmission underlies short-latency vestibular evoked potentials.
Pastras, C. J.; Curthoys, I. S.; Asadnia, M.; McAlpine, D.; Rabbitt, R. D.; Brown, D. J.
Show abstract
Amniotes evolved a unique calyceal postsynaptic terminal in the vestibular organs of the inner ear that underpins quantal and non-quantal transmission at the synapse of sensory hair cells and vestibular afferent neurons. The non-quantal component is of particular interest as it includes an ultrafast synaptic current thought to underlie the exquisite synchronization of action potentials in vestibular afferent fibres to dynamic stimuli such as sound and vibration. Here we demonstrate evidence that non-quantal transmission is responsible for short latency vestibular evoked potentials (vCAPs) in the guinea pig utricle. We first show that, unlike auditory nerve responses which are completely abolished, vCAPs are insensitive to local administration of the AMPA receptor agonist CNQX. Moreover, latency comparisons between presynaptic hair cell and postsynaptic neural responses reveal that the vCAP occurs without measurable synaptic delay. Finally, using a paired-pulse stimulus designed to deplete the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles in hair cells, we reveal that forward masking is lacking in vestibular responses, compared to the equivalent cochlear responses. Our data support the hypothesis that the fast component of non-quantal transmission at calyceal synapses is indefatigable and responsible for ultrafast responses of vestibular organs evoked by transient stimulation. SignificanceThe mammalian vestibular system drives some of the fastest reflex pathways in the nervous system, ensuring stable gaze and postural control for locomotion on land. To achieve this, terrestrial amniotes evolved a large, unique calyx afferent terminal which completely envelopes one or more pre-synaptic vestibular hair cells, which transmits mechanosensory signals mediated by quantal and nonquantal (NQ) synaptic transmission. We present several lines of data in the guinea pig that reveal the pre-synaptic transmission of the most sensitive vestibular afferents are faster than their auditory nerve counterparts. Here, we present neurophysiological and pharmacological evidence that this vestibular speed advantage arises from ultrafast NQ electrical synaptic transmission from Type I hair cells to their calyx partners.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Strengthening Medial Olivocochlear Feedback Reduces the Developmental Impact of Early Noise Exposure 96%
- Notch1 is required to maintain supporting cell identity and vestibular function during maturation of the mammalian balance organs 95%
- Physiological Basis of noise-induced hearing loss in a tympanal ear 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- An integrated system for comprehensive mouse peripheral vestibular function evaluation based on Vestibulo-ocular Reflex 94%
- Prolonged dexamethasone exposure enhances zebrafish lateral-line regeneration but disrupts mitochondrial homeostasis and hair cell function 93%
- Optimizing auditory brainstem response acquisition using interleaved frequencies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multisensory integration enhances audiovisual responses in the Mauthner cell 95%
- Distinct forms of synaptic plasticity during ascending vs. descending control of medial olivocochlear efferent neurons 94%
- Repressor element 1-silencing transcription factor deficiency yields profound hearing loss through Kv7.4 channel upsurge in auditory neurons and hair cells 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A modiolar-pillar gradient in auditory-nerve dendritic length: a novel post-synaptic contribution to dynamic range? 95%
- Outer Hair Cell Function is Normal in βV Spectrin Knockout Mice 95%
- Expression of a membrane-targeted fluorescent reporter disrupts auditory hair cell mechanoelectrical transduction and causes profound deafness. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.