Back

Genomic epidemiology of Treponema pallidum and circulation of strains with diminished tprK antigen variation capability in Seattle, 2021-2022

Lieberman, N. A.; Avendano, C.; Mohamed Bakhash, S. A.; Nunley, E.; Xie, H.; Giacani, L.; Berzkalns, A.; Soge, O. O.; Reid, T. B.; Golden, M. R.; Greninger, A. L.

2023-05-14 genomics
10.1101/2023.05.12.540601 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSyphilis incidence continues to increase dramatically in the United States and yet little is known about Treponema pallidum (TP) genomic epidemiology within American metropolitan areas. MethodsWe performed whole genome sequencing and tprK deep sequencing of 28 TP-containing specimens collected mostly from remnant Aptima swabs from 24 individuals from Seattle Sexual Health Clinic during 2021-2022. ResultsAll 12 individuals infected with Nichols lineage strains were MSM, while a specific SS14 cluster (average 0.33 SNPs) included 1 MSW and five women. All TP strains sequenced were azithromycin resistant via 23S rRNA A2058G mutation. Identical TP genomic sequences were found in pharyngeal and rectal swab specimens taken from the same individuals concurrently. tprK sequences were less variable between patient-matched specimens and between epidemiologically-linked clusters. We detected a 528 bp deletion in the tprK donor site locus, eliminating nine tprK donor sites, in TP genomes of three individuals with secondary syphilis, associated with diminution of overall tprK sequence diversity. ConclusionsWe developed an end-to-end workflow for public health genomic surveillance of TP from remnant Aptima swab specimens. With its high rate of gene conversion, tprK sequencing may assist in linking cases beyond routine TP genome sequencing. TP strains with deletions in tprK donor sites currently circulate and are associated with diminished antigenic diversity of the TprK putative outer membrane protein.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.