Back

Quantifying the relationship between cell proliferation and morphology during development of the face

Green, R. M.; Lo Vercio, L.; Dauter, A.; Barretto, E. C.; Devine, J.; Vidal Garcia, M.; Marchini, M.; Robertson, S.; Zhao, X.; Mahika, A.; Shakir, M. B.; Guo, S.; Boughner, J. C.; Dean, W.; Lander, A. D.; Marcucio, R. S.; Forkert, N. D.; Hallgrimsson, B.

2023-05-12 developmental biology
10.1101/2023.05.12.540515 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Morphogenesis requires highly coordinated, complex interactions between cellular processes: proliferation, migration, and apoptosis, along with physical tissue interactions. How these cellular and tissue dynamics drive morphogenesis remains elusive. Three dimensional (3D) microscopic imaging poses great promise, and generates elegant images. However, generating even moderate through-put quantified images is challenging for many reasons. As a result, the association between morphogenesis and cellular processes in 3D developing tissues has not been fully explored. To address this critical gap, we have developed an imaging and image analysis pipeline to enable 3D quantification of cellular dynamics along with 3D morphology for the same individual embryo. Specifically, we focus on how 3D distribution of proliferation relates to morphogenesis during mouse facial development. Our method involves imaging with light-sheet microscopy, automated segmentation of cells and tissues using machine learning-based tools, and quantification of external morphology via geometric morphometrics. Applying this framework, we show that changes in proliferation are tightly correlated to changes in morphology over the course of facial morphogenesis. These analyses illustrate the potential of this pipeline to investigate mechanistic relationships between cellular dynamics and morphogenesis during embryonic development.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.