Back

Absolute and relative excess mortality across demographic and clinical subgroups during the COVID-19 pandemic: an individual-level cohort study from a nationwide healthcare system of US Veterans

Weinberger, D. M.; Bhaskaran, K.; Korves, C.; Lucas, B. P.; Columbo, J. A.; Vashi, A.; Davies, L.; Justice, A. C.; Rentsch, C. T.

2023-05-16 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.05.12.23289900 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMost analyses of excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic have employed aggregate data. Individual-level data from the largest integrated healthcare system in the US may enhance understanding of excess mortality. MethodsWe performed an observational cohort study following patients receiving care from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) between 1 March 2018 and 28 February 2022. We estimated excess mortality on an absolute scale (i.e., excess mortality rates, number of excess deaths), and a relative scale by measuring the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality comparing pandemic and pre-pandemic periods, overall, and within demographic and clinical subgroups. Comorbidity burden and frailty were measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Veterans Aging Cohort Study Index, respectively. ResultsOf 5,905,747 patients, median age was 65.8 years and 91% were men. Overall, the excess mortality rate was 10.0 deaths/1000 person-years (PY), with a total of 103,164 excess deaths and pandemic HR of 1.25 (95% CI 1.25-1.26). Excess mortality rates were highest among the most frail patients (52.0/1000 PY) and those with the highest comorbidity burden (16.3/1000 PY). However, the largest relative mortality increases were observed among the least frail (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.30-1.32) and those with the lowest comorbidity burden (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.43-1.46). ConclusionsIndividual-level data offered crucial clinical and operational insights into US excess mortality patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Notable differences emerged among clinical risk groups, emphasising the need for reporting excess mortality in both absolute and relative terms to inform resource allocation in future outbreaks. KEY MESSAGESO_LIMost analyses of excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic have focused on evaluations of aggregate data, which may miss important individual-level drivers of excess mortality that may serve as future targets for improvement initiatives. C_LIO_LIUsing individual-level data from a national integrated healthcare system, we estimated absolute and relative excess mortality and number of excess deaths overall and within demographic and clinical subgroups. C_LIO_LIAbsolute rates of excess mortality were typically highest in groups where the baseline rate of mortality was higher; namely in older age groups and among those with more comorbidities and higher levels of physiologic frailty. C_LIO_LIRelative measures of excess mortality were typically greatest among younger age groups and among those with lower physiologic frailty and fewer comorbidities. C_LIO_LIRelative measures of excess mortality attenuated but remained elevated after censoring follow-up at first documented SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19, suggesting that factors beyond SARS-CoV-2 infection contributed to the observed excess mortality during the pandemic. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.