Prevalence Of Myopia Among Public School Children In Southern Brazil
Gus, P. I.; da Maman, R. S.; Lengler, A.; Martins, A. S.; Arteche, M. A.; Pieta, M.; Leivas, G.; Carloto, R.; Marinho, D.; Marcia, T.; Pakter, H.; Fabris, C.; Kronbauer, F.; Colossi, C.; Castro, T.; Serge, R.; Monica, J.
Show abstract
PurposeMyopia has been considered a public health issue by the World Health Organization since 2015. The growing incidence of myopia worldwide, called the myopia epidemic, and its potential blinding complications in adulthood like cataract, glaucoma, retinal detachment and maculopathy, have been extensively published and discussed in peer review papers. Nonetheless, little information about Latin America is available. This study aims to detect the prevalence of myopia in southern Brazil, the biggest country of South America. MethodsA prospective cross sectional study recruited 330 public school children between 2019 and 2021, aged 5 to 20 years old. All children underwent a comprehensive eye examination and detailed lifestyle questionnaire. The Pearson correlation coefficient, Kruskal Wallys and the Chi-Square Test were used to assess simple correlations and associations between myopia and medical conditions, use of medications, ophthalmic history and family history of ocular conditions, besides demographics and lifestyle focused on screen time/day. Associations between the results of the ophthalmologic evaluation and all factors included in the questionnaire were analyzed using the Generalized Estimating Equation model (GEE). The prevalence of hyperopia and astigmatism were also assessed. ResultsTotal prevalence of myopia was 17.4% (CI 13.8 - 21.7%). Low myopia (-0.50D to -5.75D) comprised 15.2% (CI 11.9 - 19.3%) and high myopia (-6,00D or worse) was 2.1% (CI 1.1 - 4.1%). Relative risk of myopia for females was 1.6 (CI 1.00 - 2.57%) and each additional hour of screen time increased a childs chance of having myopia by 6.5%. The prevalence of hyperopia was 7,7% (CI 5.4 -10.9%) and of astigmatism, either myopic or hyperopic, was 25.6% (CI 21.4 - 30.2%). ConclusionsBrazil has always been considered a hyperopic country. These are the highest reported prevalences of myopia under cycloplegia and the first paper to present myopia as a more prevalent refractive error than hyperopia among Brazilian school children to date.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying the Influencing Factors for Cataract Surgery Uptake in Malaysia 97%
- Demographic profiles of contact lens wearers and their association with lens wear characteristics in Trinidad and Tobago: A retrospective study 96%
- Prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in Kogi state, Nigeria – Findings from a Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness survey 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated vision screening of children using a mobile graphic device 94%
- Association of renal function with diabetic retinopathy and macular edema among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 92%
- Increasing frequency of hospital admissions for retinal detachment and vitreo-retinal surgery in England 2000-2018 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinicopathological Evaluation of Dry eyes and Ocular surface in Newly diagnosed patients of Hyperthyroidism and Hypothyroidism and its Comparison to Healthy Subjects 96%
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 96%
- Influence of Factor V Leiden mutation and Protein C/S deficiencies on preeclampsia among Sudanese women 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Argon Laser Photocoagulation for Treatment of Presumed Trematode-induced Granulomatous Anterior Uveitis in Children 94%
- Optic nerve tortuosity and displacements during horizontal eye movements in healthy and highly myopic subjects 94%
- Risk Model for Intraoperative Complication during Cataract Surgery Based on Data from 900,000 Eyes – Previous Intravitreal Injection is a Risk Factor 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.