Back

Heterogeneous changes in mobility in response to the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 outbreak in Shanghai

Zhang, J.; Tan, S.; Peng, C.; Xu, X.; Wang, M.; Lu, W.; Wu, Y.; Sai, B.; Cai, M.; Kummer, A. G.; Chen, Z.; Zou, J.; Li, W.; Zheng, W.; Liang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Vespignani, A.; Ajelli, M.; Lu, X.; Yu, H.

2023-05-16 public and global health
10.1101/2023.05.12.23289890 medRxiv
Show abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the measures taken by authorities to control its spread had altered human behavior and mobility patterns in an unprecedented way. However, it remains unclear whether the population response to a COVID-19 outbreak varies within a city or among demographic groups. Here we utilized passively recorded cellular signaling data at a spatial resolution of 1km x 1km for over 5 million users and epidemiological surveillance data collected during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 outbreak from February to June 2022 in Shanghai, China, to investigate the heterogeneous response of different segments of the population at the within-city level and examine its relationship with the actual risk of infection. Changes in behavior were spatially heterogenous within the city and population groups, and associated with both the infection incidence and adopted interventions. We also found that males and individuals aged 30-59 years old traveled more frequently, traveled longer distances, and their communities were more connected; the same groups were also associated with the highest SARS-CoV-2 incidence. Our results highlight the heterogeneous behavioral change of the Shanghai population to the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 outbreak and the its effect on the heterogenous spread of COVID-19, both spatially and demographically. These findings could be instrumental for the design of targeted interventions for the control and mitigation of future outbreaks of COVID-19 and, more broadly, of respiratory pathogens. Significance StatementOur study utilized passively recorded cellular signaling data and epidemiological surveillance data to investigate the changes human mobility to a COVID-19 outbreak at an unprecedented within-city level and examine its relationship with the actual risk of infection. Our findings highlight the heterogeneous behavioral change of the Shanghai population to the 2022 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 outbreak and its heterogenous effect on the SARS-CoV-2 spread, both spatially and demographically. The implications of our findings could be instrumental to inform spatially targeted interventions at the within-city scale to mitigate possible new surges of COVID-19 cases as well as fostering preparedness for future respiratory infections disease outbreaks.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.3%
2
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
10
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
18
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
27
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%