Back

Transcript errors generate a continuous stream of amyloid and prion-like proteins in human cells

Chung, C.; Kou, Y.; Shemtov, S. `; Verheijen, B. M.; Flores, I.; Love, K.; del Dosso, A.; Thorwald, M. A.; Liu, Y.; Toney, R. G.; Carrillo, L.; Nguyen, M. M.; Biao, H.; Jin, Y.; Jauregui, A. M.; Quiroz, J. D.; Moore, D. L.; Simpson, S.; Thomas, K.; Coba, M.; Li, Z.; Benayoun, B. A.; Rosenthal, J.; Kennedy, S. R.; Quadrato, G.; Gout, J.-F.; Chen, L.; Vermulst, M.

2023-05-11 molecular biology
10.1101/2023.05.11.540433 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aging is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid and prion-like proteins. However, the molecular mechanisms by which these proteins arise remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that transcript errors generate amyloid and prion-like proteins in a wide variety of human cell types, including stem cells, brain organoids, and fully differentiated neurons. Intriguingly, some of these proteins are identical to proteins previously implicated in familial cases of amyloid diseases, raising the possibility that both familial and non-familial cases are caused by identical mutant proteins. However, transcript errors also generate amyloid proteins that have not been observed before, suggesting that aging cells are exposed to a second class of pathogenic proteins we are currently unaware of. Finally, we show that transcript errors are readily generated by DNA damage, a hallmark of human aging and a staple of multiple proteotoxic diseases, including Alzheimers disease. Together, these observations greatly expand our understanding of mutagenesis in human aging and disease and suggest a new mechanism by which amyloid diseases can develop.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
11.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.7%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.5%
7
Molecular Cell
○ 350 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Journal of Biological Chemistry
○ 690 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
9
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
PNAS Nexus
◐ 159 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
12
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
236 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
13
PLOS Pathogens
● 820 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
14
Science Translational Medicine
● 127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
The EMBO Journal
○ 309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
mBio
● 833 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
17
Genes & Development
● 90 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Journal of Molecular Biology
○ 232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
EMBO Reports
○ 263 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
PLOS Genetics
● 862 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
21
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
22
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%
23
EMBO Molecular Medicine
○ 95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
Molecular Neurodegeneration
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.