Back
Top 6%
18.4%
#1
18.4%
Top 45%
15.2%
#1
12.3%
Top 5%
4.0%
Top 0.7%
3.2%
Top 7%
1.6%
Top 11%
1.6%
Top 7%
1.4%
Top 5%
1.4%
Top 92%
1.0%
Top 23%
1.0%
Top 26%
0.7%
Top 29%
0.7%
Top 5%
0.7%
Top 25%
0.7%
Top 32%
0.7%
Systematic review search strategies are poorly described and not reproducible: a cross-sectional meta-research study
2023-05-16
epidemiology
Title + abstract only
View on medRxiv
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo determine the reproducibility of biomedical systematic review search strategies. DesignCross-sectional meta-research study. PopulationRandom sample of 100 systematic reviews indexed in MEDLINE in November 2021. Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome measure is the percentage of systematic reviews for which all database searches can be reproduced. This was operationalized as fulfilling six key PRISMA-S reporting guideline items (database name, multi-database searching, full searc...
Predicted journal destinations
1
BMJ Open
553 training papers
2
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
29 training papers
3
PLOS ONE
1737 training papers
4
Research Synthesis Methods
17 training papers
5
BMC Medicine
155 training papers
6
BMC Medical Research Methodology
41 training papers
7
PLOS Medicine
95 training papers
8
BMJ Global Health
95 training papers
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
65 training papers
10
American Journal of Epidemiology
54 training papers
11
Scientific Reports
701 training papers
12
JAMA Network Open
125 training papers
13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
219 training papers
14
BMC Public Health
148 training papers
15
European Journal of Epidemiology
36 training papers
16
BMC Infectious Diseases
110 training papers
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
116 training papers