Robust discovery of causal gene networks via measurement error estimation and correction
Biswas, R.; V P, B.; Dumrewal, A.; Narayanan, M.
Show abstract
Discovering causal relations among genes from observational data is a fundamental problem in systems biology, especially in humans where direct gene interventions or perturbations are unethical/infeasible. Furthermore, causality is emerging as an integral factor for building interpretable and generalizable machine-learning models of complex phenotypes. Existing methods can discover causal relations from observed gene expression and matched genetic data using the well-established framework of Mendelian Randomization. But, the prevalence of expression measurement errors can mislead most existing methods into making wrong causal discoveries, especially among genes transcribed at low to moderate levels and using data with large sample size (say thousands as in modern genomic or GWAS studies). In this study, we propose a new framework for causal discovery that is robust against measurement noise by extending an established statistical approach CIT (Causal Inference Test). We specifically developed a two-stage approach called RCD (Robust Causal Discovery), wherein we first estimate measurement error from gene expression data and then incorporate it to get consistent parameter estimates that could be used with appropriately extended statistical tests of correlation or mediation done in the original CIT. By quantifying and accounting for noise in the data, our RCD method is able to significantly outperform the baseline method in recovering ground-truth causal relations among simulated noisy genes and transcription factor to target gene relations among noisy yeast genes using data on 1012 yeast segregants. Encouraged by these results, we applied our RCD to a human setting where perturbations are infeasible and identified several causal relations, including ones involving transcriptional regulators in the skeletal muscle tissue. Data and Code AvailabilityThe code that implements our two-stage RCD framework is available here: https://github.com/BIRDSgroup/RCD; code for reproducing the figures/tables in this manuscript is also provided in this link.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- CoVar: A generalizable machine learning approach to identify the coordinated regulators driving variational gene expression 96%
- Reconstruction Set Test (RESET): a computationally efficient method for single sample gene set testing based on randomized reduced rank reconstruction error 96%
- DOT: Gene-set analysis by combining decorrelated association statistics 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- TISSLET Tissues-based Learning Estimation for Transcriptomics 97%
- Estimating the effect size of a hidden causal factor between SNPs and a continuous trait: a mediation model approach 96%
- Benchmarking imputation methods for network inference using a novel method of synthetic scRNA-seq data generation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the overall fraction of phenotypic variance attributed to high-dimensional predictors measured with error 95%
- ACTOR: a latent Dirichlet model to compare expressed isoform proportions to a reference panel 95%
- Overcoming the impacts of two-step batch effect correction on gene expression estimation and inference 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.