Back

iFlpMosaics: A method for the ratiometric induction and high-throughput comparative analysis of mutant and wildtype cells

Garcia-Gonzalez, I.; Gambera, S.; Regano, A.; Rocha, S. F.; Garcia-Ortega, L.; Lytvyn, M.; Sanchez-Munoz, M. S.; Garcia-Cabero, A.; Zagorac, I.; Luo, W.; Fernandez-Chacon, M.; Casquero-Garcia, V.; Lunella, F. F.; Benedito, R.

2023-05-10 cell biology
10.1101/2023.05.09.540000 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To understand gene function, it is necessary to compare cells carrying the mutated target gene with normal cells. In most biomedical studies, the cells being compared are in different mutant and control animals and therefore do not experience the same epigenetic changes and tissue microenvironment. The experimental induction of genetic mosaics is essential to determine a gene cell-autonomous function and to model the etiology of diseases caused by somatic mutations. Current technologies used to induce genetic mosaics in mice lack either accuracy, throughput or barcoding diversity. Here, we present a large set of new genetic tools and mouse lines that enable Flp recombinase-dependent ratiometric induction and single-cell clonal tracking of multiple fluorescently labeled wildtype and Cre-mutant cells within the same time window and tissue microenvironment. The labeled cells can be profiled by multispectral imaging or by FACS and scRNA-seq. This technology facilitates the induction and analysis of genetic mosaics in any cell type and for any given single or combination of floxed genes. iFlpMosaics enables a more accurate understanding of how induced genetic mutations affect the biology of single cells during tissue development, homeostasis, and disease.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.5%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
5.2%
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.2%
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.2%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
9
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
10
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.4%
11
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
12
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
14
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
15
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
16
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
28
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.5%