Back

Investigating the causal effects of childhood and adulthood adiposity on later life mental health outcome: a Mendelian randomisation study

pathak, s.; Richardson, T. G.; Sanderson, E.; asvold, B. O.; Bhatta, L.; Brumpton, B.

2023-05-10 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.05.09.23289512 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundObesity particularly during childhood is considered a global public health crisis and has been linked with later life health consequences including mental health.However, there is lack of causal understanding if childhood adiposity has a direct effect on mental health or has an indirect effect after accounting for adulthood body size. ObjectiveTo investigate the total and direct effect of childhood adiposity on later life anxiety and depression. MethodTwo-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was performed to estimate the total effect and direct effect (accounting for adulthood body size) of childhood body size on anxiety and depression. We used summary statistics from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of UK Biobank (n=453,169) and large-scale consortia of anxiety (Million Veteran Program) and depression (Psychiatric Genomics Consortium) (n=175,163 and n=173,005, respectively). ResultUnivariable MR did not indicate genetically predicted effects of childhood body size with later life anxiety (beta=-0.05, 95% CI=-0.13, 0.02), and depression (OR=1.06, 95% CI=0.94, 1.20). However, using multivariable MR, we observed that the higher body size in childhood reduced the risk of later life anxiety (beta=-0.19, 95% CI=-0.29, -0.08) and depression (OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.71, 0.97). Both univariable and multivariable MR indicated that higher body size in adulthood increased the risk of later life anxiety and depression. ConclusionOur findings suggest that the higher body size in childhood has a protective effect on later life anxiety and depression, if obesity is not present into adulthood. Higher body size in adulthood was a risk factor for later life anxiety and depression.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.