Back

Gibberellin and the miRNA156-targeted SlSBPs synergistically regulate tomato floral meristem activity and fruit patterning

Ferigolo, L. F.; Vicente, M. H.; Correa, J. P.; Barrera-Rojas, C. H.; Silva, E. M.; Silva, G. F.; Carvalho, A.; Peres, L. E.; Ambrosano, G. B.; Margarido, G. R.; Sablowski, R.; Nogueira, F. T.

2023-05-09 plant biology
10.1101/2023.05.08.539891 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many developmental processes associated with fruit development take place at the floral meristem (FM). Age-regulated microRNA156 (miR156) and gibberellins (GA) interact to control flowering time, but their interplay in subsequent stages of reproductive development is poorly understood. Here, we show that GA and miR156 function in tomato FM and fruit patterning. High GA responses or overexpression of miR156 (156OE), which leads to low levels of miR156-targeted SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN- LIKE (SPL/SBP), resulted in enlarged FMs, defects in FM determinacy and fruits with increased locule number. Conversely, low GA responses reduced fruit indeterminacy and locule number, and overexpression of a miR156-resistant SlSBP15 allele (rSBP15) reduced cell number and size in the FM, as well as locule number. GA responses were partially required for the fruit defects observed in 156OE and rSBP15 plants. Transcriptome analysis and genetic interactions revealed shared and divergent functions of miR156-targeted SlSBPs, PROCERA/DELLA and the classical WUSCHEL/CLAVATA pathway, which has been previously associated with meristem size and determinacy. Our findings reveal that the miR156/SlSBP/GA regulatory module is deployed differently depending on developmental stage and create novel opportunities to genetically fine-tune aspects of fruit development that have been important for tomato domestication.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.