Lateralized Neural Entropy modulates with Grip Force during Precision Grasping
Rao, N.; Paek, A. Y.; Contreras-Vidal, J. L.; Parikh, P. J.
Show abstract
When holding a coffee mug filled to the brim, we strive to avoid spilling the coffee. This ability relies on the neural processes underlying the control of finger forces on a moment-to-moment basis. The brain activity lateralized to the contralateral hemisphere averaged over a trial and across the trials is known to be associated with the magnitude of grip force applied on an object. However, the mechanistic involvement of the variability in neural signals during grip force control remains unclear. In this study, we examined the dependence of neural variability over the frontal, central, and parietal regions assessed using noninvasive electroencephalography (EEG) on grip force magnitude during an isometric force control task. We hypothesized laterally specific modulation in EEG variability with higher magnitude of the grip force exerted during grip force control. We utilized an existing EEG dataset (64 channel) comprised of healthy young adults, who performed an isometric force control task while receiving visual feedback of the force applied. The force magnitude to be exerted on the instrumented object was cued to participants during the task, and varied pseudorandomly among 5, 10, and 15% of their maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) across the trials. We quantified neural variability via sample entropy (sequence-dependent measure) and standard deviation (sequence-independent measure) of the temporal EEG signal over the frontal, central, and parietal electrodes. The EEG sample entropy over the central electrodes showed lateralized, nonlinear, localized, modulation with force magnitude. Similar modulation was not observed over frontal or parietal EEG activity, nor for standard deviation in the EEG activity. Our findings highlight specificity in neural control of grip forces by demonstrating the modulation in sequence-dependent but not sequence-independent component of EEG variability. This modulation appeared to be lateralized, spatially constrained, and functionally dependent on the grip force magnitude. We discuss the relevance of these findings in scenarios where a finer precision is essential to enable grasp application, such as prosthesis and associated neural signal integration, and propose directions for future studies investigating the mechanistic role of neural entropy in grip force control.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Early categorization of social affordances during the visual encoding of bodily stimuli 96%
- Cortical neural activity during responses to mechanical perturbation: Effects of hand preference and hand used 96%
- Early beta oscillations in multisensory association areas underlie crossmodal performance enhancement 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mobile EEG reveals functionally dissociable dynamic processes supporting real-world ambulatory obstacle avoidance: Evidence for early proactive control 95%
- Alteration of brain dynamics during natural dual-task walking 95%
- To See, Not to See, or to See Poorly: Perceptual Quality and Guess Rate as a Function of Electroencephalography (EEG) Brain Activity in an Orientation Perception Task 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The bodily appearance of a virtual partner affects the activity of the action observation and action monitoring systems in a minimally interactive task 96%
- Brain encoding of naturalistic, continuous, and unpredictable tactile events 95%
- Strength of low-frequency EEG phase entrainment to external stimuli is associated with fluctuations in the brain's internal state 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spectral distribution dynamics across different attentional priority states 96%
- Temporal signatures of criticality in human cortical excitability as probed by early somatosensory responses 95%
- Projection of Cortical Beta Band Oscillations to a Motor Neuron Pool Across the Full Range of Recruitment 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.