Insights from a genome-wide truth set of tandem repeat variation
Weisburd, B.; Tiao, G.; Rehm, H. L.
Show abstract
Tools for genotyping tandem repeats (TRs) from short read sequencing data have improved significantly over the past decade. Extensive comparisons of these tools to gold standard diagnostic methods like RP-PCR have confirmed their accuracy for tens to hundreds of well-studied loci. However, a scarcity of high-quality orthogonal truth data limited our ability to measure tool accuracy for the millions of other loci throughout the genome. To address this, we developed a TR truth set based on the Synthetic Diploid Benchmark (SynDip). By identifying the subset of insertions and deletions that represent TR expansions or contractions with motifs between 2 and 50 base pairs, we obtained accurate genotypes for 139,795 pure and 6,845 interrupted repeats in a single diploid sample. Our approach did not require running existing genotyping tools on short read or long read sequencing data and provided an alternative, more accurate view of tandem repeat variation. We applied this truth set to compare the strengths and weaknesses of widely-used tools for genotyping TRs, evaluated the completeness of existing genome-wide TR catalogs, and explored the properties of tandem repeat variation throughout the genome. We found that, without filtering, ExpansionHunter had higher accuracy than GangSTR and HipSTR over a wide range of motifs and allele sizes. Also, when errors in allele size occurred, ExpansionHunter tended to overestimate expansion sizes, while GangSTR tended to underestimate them. Additionally, we saw that widely-used TR catalogs miss between 16% and 41% of variant loci in the truth set. These results suggest that genome-wide analyses would benefit from genotyping a larger set of loci as well as further tool development that builds on the strengths of current algorithms. To that end, we developed a new catalog of 2.8 million loci that captures 95% of variant loci in the truth set, and created a modified version of ExpansionHunter that runs 2 to 3x faster than the original while producing the same output.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Allo: Accurate allocation of multi-mapped reads enables regulatory element analysis at repeats 96%
- An Algorithm for Sequence Location Approximation using Nuclear Families (ASLAN) Validates Regions of the Telomere-to-Telomere Assembly and Identifies New Hotspots for Genetic Diversity 96%
- High-fidelity, Large-scale Targeted Profiling of Microsatellites 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Paragraph: A graph-based structural variant genotyper for short-read sequence data 97%
- STRling: a k-mer counting approach that detects short tandem repeat expansions at known and novel loci 96%
- Quartet DNA reference materials and datasets for comprehensively evaluating germline variants calling performance 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benchmarking challenging small variants with linked and long reads 96%
- Polymorphic short tandem repeats make widespread contributions to blood and serum traits 95%
- Targeted long-read sequencing facilitates phased diploid assembly and genotyping of the human T cell receptor alpha, delta and beta loci 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.