Back

Vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in Children below 5 Years in German Primary Care

Strumann, C.; Ranzani, O.; Moor, J.; Berner, R.; Toepfner, N.; Chao, C.-M.; Moor, M. B.

2023-05-08 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.05.05.23289209 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite the approval of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine for children aged 6 months to 4 years by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) in 2022, no data on vaccine effectiveness (VE) of BNT162b2 are available in this age group. We here report on the VE of BNT162b2 during an Omicron BA.1-2 dominant period. MethodsAn authentication-based retrospective survey was performed between April 14th 2022 and May 9th 2022 in individuals that had registered children for off-label SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Germany. We used Cox regression to estimate relative VE of two BNT162b2 doses, with the period between first and second vaccine dose as reference period (24.8+-0.6 days) and >=7 days after Dose 2 to before Dose 3 as post-vaccination period (59.5+-23.6 days). ResultsThe present analysis included 4615 children aged 2.8+-1.2 years (mean+-standard deviation) who had received their first dose of BNT162b2 on January 1st 2022 or thereafter. VE was substantial for protection from any SARS-CoV-2 infection (VE: 53.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 36.3-69.6%], p<0.001), symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections (VE: 57.5% [95% CI: 40.8-74.2%], p<0.001), and SARS-CoV-2 infections leading to medication use (VE: 66.2% [95% CI: 43.7-88.7%], p<0.001). Differences in dosage of BNT162b2 yielded no change in VE. ConclusionThis study offers a first industry-independent insight in the potential VE of two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine in children aged below 5 years, as currently only immunogenicity data by the manufacturer Pfizer/BioNTech are available. Limitations include the retrospective study design, and that the reported VE does not necessarily correspond to currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.