Back

Long-read sequencing and profiling of RNA-binding proteins reveals the pathogenic mechanism of aberrant splicing of an SCN1A poison exon in epilepsy

Happ, H. C.; Schneider, P. N.; Hong, J. H.; Goes, E.; Bandouil, M.; Biar, C. G.; Ramamurthy, A.; Reese, F.; Engel, K.; Weckhuysen, S.; Scheffer, I. E.; Mefford, H. C.; Calhoun, J. D.; Carvill, G. L.

2023-05-04 genetics
10.1101/2023.05.04.538282 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pathogenic loss-of-function SCN1A variants cause a spectrum of seizure disorders. We previously identified variants in individuals with SCN1A-related epilepsy that fall in or near a poison exon (PE) in SCN1A intron 20 (20N). We hypothesized these variants lead to increased PE inclusion, which introduces a premature stop codon, and, therefore, reduced abundance of the full-length SCN1A transcript and Nav1.1 protein. We used a splicing reporter assay to interrogate PE inclusion in HEK293T cells. In addition, we used patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) differentiated into neurons to quantify 20N inclusion by long and short-read sequencing and Nav1.1 abundance by western blot. We performed RNA-antisense purification with mass spectrometry to identify RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that could account for the aberrant PE splicing. We demonstrate that variants in/near 20N lead to increased 20N inclusion by long-read sequencing or splicing reporter assay and decreased Nav1.1 abundance. We also identified 28 RBPs that differentially interact with variant constructs compared to wild-type, including SRSF1 and HNRNPL. We propose a model whereby 20N variants disrupt RBP binding to splicing enhancers (SRSF1) and suppressors (HNRNPL), to favor PE inclusion. Overall, we demonstrate that SCN1A 20N variants cause haploinsufficiency and SCN1A-related epilepsies. This work provides insights into the complex control of RBP-mediated PE alternative splicing, with broader implications for PE discovery and identification of pathogenic PE variants in other genetic conditions.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.