The adaptive stochasticity hypothesis: modelling equifinality, multifinality and adaptation to adversity
Carozza, S.; Akarca, D.; Astle, D.
Show abstract
Neural phenotypes are the result of probabilistic developmental processes. This means that stochasticity is an intrinsic aspect of the brain as it self-organizes over a protracted period. In other words, while both genomic and environmental factors shape the developing nervous system, another significant--though often neglected--contributor is the randomness introduced by probability distributions. Using generative modelling of brain networks, we provide a framework for probing the contribution of stochasticity to neurodevelopmental diversity. To mimic the prenatal scaffold of brain structure set by activity-independent mechanisms, we start our simulations from the medio-posterior neonatal rich-club (Developing Human Connectome Project; dHCP, n = 630). From this initial starting point, models implementing Hebbian-like wiring processes generate variable yet consistently plausible brain network topologies. By analyzing repeated runs of the generative process (> 107 simulations), we identify critical determinants and effects of stochasticity. Namely, we find that stochastic variation has a greater impact on brain organization when networks develop under weaker constraints. This heightened stochasticity makes brain networks more robust to random and targeted attacks, but more often results in non-normative phenotypic outcomes. To test our framework empirically, we evaluated whether stochasticity varies according to the experience of early-life deprivation using a cohort of neurodiverse children (Centre for Attention, Learning and Memory; CALM n = 357). We show that low socioeconomic status predicts more stochastic brain wiring. We conclude that stochasticity may be an unappreciated contributor to relevant developmental outcomes, and make specific predictions for future research.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Two roles for choice selective inhibition in decision-making circuits 95%
- The ascending arousal system shapes low-dimensional brain dynamics to mediate awareness of changes in intrinsic cognitive states 95%
- Influence of On-Off dynamics and selective attention on the spatial pattern of correlated variability in neocortex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population structure across scales facilitates coexistence and spatial heterogeneity of antibiotic-resistant infections 94%
- Emergent neural dynamics and geometry for generalization in a transitive inference task 94%
- How the dynamic interplay of cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic pathways shapes the time course of deliberation and commitment 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.