Selective Enhancer Dependencies in MYC-Intact and MYC-Rearranged Germinal Center B-cell Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Iyer, A. R.; Gurumurthy, A.; Kodgule, R.; Aguilar, A. R.; Saari, T.; Ramzan, A.; Rausch, D.; Gupta, J.; Hall, C. N.; Runge, J. S.; Weiss, M. B.; Rahmat, M.; Anyoha, R.; Fulco, C. P.; Ghobrial, I. M.; Engreitz, J. M.; Cieslik, M. P.; Ryan, R. J.
Show abstract
High expression of MYC and its target genes define a subset of germinal center B-cell diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (GCB-DLBCL) associated with poor outcomes. Half of these high-grade cases show chromosomal rearrangements between the MYC locus and heterologous enhancer-bearing loci, while focal deletions of the adjacent non-coding gene PVT1 are enriched in MYC-intact cases. To identify genomic drivers of MYC activation, we used high-throughput CRISPR-interference (CRISPRi) profiling of candidate enhancers in the MYC locus and rearrangement partner loci in GCB-DLBCL cell lines and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) comparators that lacked common rearrangements between MYC and immunoglobulin (Ig) loci. Rearrangements between MYC and non-Ig loci were associated with unique dependencies on specific enhancer subunits within those partner loci. Notably, fitness dependency on enhancer modules within the BCL6 super-enhancer (BCL6-SE) cluster regulated by a transcription factor complex of MEF2B, POU2F2, and POU2AF1 was higher in cell lines bearing a recurrent MYC::BCL6-SE rearrangement. In contrast, GCB-DLBCL cell lines without MYC rearrangement were highly dependent on a previously uncharacterized 3 enhancer within the MYC locus itself (GCBME-1), that is regulated in part by the same triad of factors. GCBME-1 is evolutionarily conserved and active in normal germinal center B cells in humans and mice, suggesting a key role in normal germinal center B cell biology. Finally, we show that the PVT1 promoter limits MYC activation by either native or heterologous enhancers and demonstrate that this limitation is bypassed by 3 rearrangements that remove PVT1 from its position in cis with the rearranged MYC gene. Key pointsO_LICRISPR-interference screens identify a conserved germinal center B cell MYC enhancer that is essential for GCB-DLBCL lacking MYC rearrangements. C_LIO_LIFunctional profiling of MYC partner loci reveals principles of MYC enhancer-hijacking activation by non-immunoglobulin rearrangements. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- RBM15-MKL1 fusion protein promotes leukemia via m6A methylation and WNT pathway activation 95%
- Enhancer heterogeneity in acute lymphoblastic leukemia drives differential gene expression between patients 95%
- Alternative splicing of its 5'-UTR limits CD20 mRNA translation and enables resistance to CD20-directed immunotherapies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamics of genome architecture and chromatin function during human B cell differentiation and neoplastic transformation 96%
- Aberrant non-canonical NF-kappaB signalling reprograms the epigenome landscape to drive oncogenic transcriptomes in multiple myeloma 96%
- Cooperative super-enhancer inactivation caused by heterozygous loss of CREBBP and KMT2D skews B cell fate decisions and yields T cell-depleted lymphomas 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The conserved N-terminal SANT1-binding domain (SBD) of EZH2 Regulates PRC2 Activity 96%
- Transient genomic instability drives tumorigenesis through accelerated clonal evolution 95%
- Methylation of histone H3 lysine 36 is a barrier for therapeutic interventions of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single cell view of tumor microenvironment gradients in pleural mesothelioma 94%
- Overcoming clinical resistance to EZH2 inhibition using rational epigenetic combination therapy 94%
- Catalytic inhibition of KAT6/KAT7 enhances the efficacy and overcomes primary and acquired resistance to Menin inhibitors in MLL leukaemia 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.