Back

Synergistic effects of predation and parasitism on competition between edible and inedible phytoplankton

Kasada, M.; Thongthaisong, P.; Wollrab, S.; Van den Wyngaert, S.; Kiel, C.; Berger, S. A.; Grossart, H.-P.

2023-05-01 ecology
10.1101/2023.05.01.538997 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fungi can affect aquatic ecosystems through syntrophic and parasitic interactions with other organisms and organic matter. In pelagic systems, fungal parasites on phytoplankton can control trophic interactions and food-web dynamics, e.g., zooplankton grazing on fungal parasite zoospores creates an alternative energy pathway (termed "mycoloop") from otherwise inedible phytoplankton species. We aim to investigate how the mycoloop influences community dynamics in aquatic food-webs combining experimental and modelling approaches. We assembled an experimental system consisting of an inedible (host) phytoplankton species and its parasitic chytrid, an edible (non-host) phytoplankton species, and a zooplankton grazer. Chytrids parasitizing increased edible phytoplankton abundance, while zooplankton grazing decreased edible phytoplankton abundance. In the presence of zooplankton and chytrids, competition effects between edible and inedible phytoplankton species depended on nutrient levels. At high nutrient levels, competition was balanced by an indirect positive chytrid effect and negative zooplankton grazing effects on edible phytoplankton. In contrast, at low nutrient levels, we found chytrid had a negative impact on edible phytoplankton synergistically with zooplankton. Mathematical investigations suggest that the synergistic effect can be caused by the mycoloop. This indicates that the mycoloop substantially affects predator-prey interactions and phytoplankton competition with yet unknown ecological consequences.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.