Back

An in vitro assay to investigate venom neurotoxin activity on muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptor activation and for the discovery of toxin-inhibitory molecules

Patel, R. N.; Clare, R. H.; Ledsgaard, L.; Nys, M.; Kool, J.; Laustsen, A. H.; Ulens, C.; Casewell, N. R.

2023-04-29 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2023.04.28.538762 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Snakebite envenoming is a neglected tropical disease that causes over 100,000 deaths annually. Envenomings result in variable pathologies, but systemic neurotoxicity is among the most serious and is currently only treated with difficult to access and variably efficacious commercial antivenoms. Venom-induced neurotoxicity is often caused by -neurotoxins antagonising the muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR), a ligand-gated ion channel. Discovery of therapeutics targeting -neurotoxins is hampered by relying on binding assays that do not reveal restoration of receptor activity or more costly and/or lower throughput electrophysiology-based approaches. Here, we report the validation of a screening assay for nAChR activation using immortalised TE671 cells expressing the {gamma}-subunit containing muscle-type nAChR and a fluorescent dye that reports changes in cell membrane potential. Assay validation using traditional nAChR agonists and antagonists, which either activate or block ion fluxes, was consistent with previous studies. We then characterised antagonism of the nAChR by a variety of elapid snake venoms that cause muscle paralysis in snakebite victims, before defining the toxin-inhibiting activities of commercial antivenoms, and new types of snakebite therapeutic candidates, namely monoclonal antibodies, decoy receptors, and small molecules. Our findings show robust evidence of assay uniformity across 96-well plates and highlight the amenability of this approach for the future discovery of new snakebite therapeutics via screening campaigns. The described assay therefore represents a useful first-step approach for identifying -neurotoxins and their inhibitors in the context of snakebite envenoming, and it should provide wider value for studying modulators of nAChR activity from other sources.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Toxins
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.5%
3
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
6
British Journal of Pharmacology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
9
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
10
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
11
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
12
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
14
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
18
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
20
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
25
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%