Back

An RNA Damage Response Network Mediates the Lethality of 5-FU in Clinically Relevant Tumor Types

Chen, J.-K.; Merrick, K. A.; Kong, Y. W.; Izrael-Tomasevic, A.; Eng, G.; Handly, E. D.; Patterson, J. C.; Suarez-Lopez, L.; Hosios, A. M.; Dinh, A.; Kirkpatrick, D. S.; Yu, K.; Rose, C. M.; Hernandez, J. M.; Hwangbo, H.; Palmer, A. C.; Vander Heiden, M.; Yilmaz, O. H.; Yaffe, M. B.

2023-04-29 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.04.28.538590 bioRxiv
Show abstract

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a successful and broadly used anti-cancer therapeutic. A major mechanism of action of 5-FU is thought to be through thymidylate synthase (TYMS) inhibition resulting in dTTP depletion and activation of the DNA damage response. This suggests that 5-FU should synergize with other DNA damaging agents. However, we found that combinations of 5-FU and oxaliplatin or irinotecan failed to display any evidence of synergy in clinical trials, and resulted in sub-additive killing in a panel of colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines. In seeking to understand this antagonism, we unexpectedly found that an RNA damage response during ribosome biogenesis dominates the drugs efficacy in tumor types for which 5-FU shows clinical benefit. 5-FU has an inherent bias for RNA incorporation, and blocking this greatly reduced drug-induced lethality, indicating that accumulation of damaged RNA is more deleterious than the lack of new RNA synthesis. Using 5-FU metabolites that specifically incorporate into either RNA or DNA revealed that CRC cell lines and patient-derived colorectal cancer organoids are inherently more sensitive to RNA damage. This difference held true in cell lines from other tissues in which 5-FU has shown clinical utility, whereas cell lines from tumor tissues that lack clinical 5-FU responsiveness typically showed greater sensitivity to the drugs DNA damage effects. Analysis of changes in the phosphoproteome and ubiquitinome shows RNA damage triggers the selective ubiquitination of multiple ribosomal proteins leading to autophagy-dependent rRNA catabolism and proteasome-dependent degradation of ubiquitinated ribosome proteins. Further, RNA damage response to 5-FU is selectively enhanced by compounds that promote ribosome biogenesis, such as KDM2A inhibitors. These results demonstrate the presence of a strong RNA damage response linked to apoptotic cell death, with clear utility of combinatorially targeting this response in cancer therapy.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.9%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
5
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
7
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
8
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
11
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.4%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
14
NAR Cancer
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
16
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.1%
23
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
25
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
28
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%