Effect of vaccination on time till Long COVID, a comparison of two ways to model effect of vaccination and two outcome definitions
Smits, P. D.; Rodriguez, P. J.; Gratzl, S.; Goodwin Cartwright, B. M.; Gilson, S.; Lee, R. H.; Baker, C.; Stucky, N.
Show abstract
Long COVID, or post-COVID syndrome, is a constellation of symptoms observed in patients at least four weeks after COVID-19 infection. We analyzed the effect of COVID-19 vaccination status on risk of either developing Long COVID symptoms or being diagnosed with Long COVID. In separate analyses we compared the effect of vaccination status at time of COVID-19 infection and the effect of vaccination status as a time-dependent covariate where vaccination could occur at any point with respect to COVID-19 infection. To address this question, we identified a subset of adult patients from Truveta Data who experienced a COVID-19 infection as indicated by a positive laboratory test between 2021-10-01 and 2022-11-31. We considered two distinct ways of modeling the effect of vaccination status (time-independent and time-dependent) and two distinct outcomes of interest (Long COVID symptoms or diagnosis with Long COVID), representing four distinct analyses. The presence of Long COVID symptoms was defined as the presence of one or more new symptoms consistent with COVID-19/Long COVID at least four weeks post COVID-19 infection. Diagnosis of Long COVID was determined by the presence of one or more ICD-10-CM or SNOMED-CT codes explicitly identifying a patient as having been diagnosed with Long COVID. Our analysis focusing on the effect of COVID-19 vaccination status at time of COVID-19 infection found that patients who had completed a primary COVID-19 vaccination sequence or had completed a primary vaccination sequence and received a booster dose at time of COVID-19 infection were on average at lower risk of either developing Long COVID symptoms or being diagnosed with Long COVID than unvaccinated patients (vaccinated versus unvaccinated HR of symptoms 0.9 [0.87-0.94], HR of diagnosis 0.86 [0.74-0.99]; vaccinated and boosted versus unvaccinated HR of symptoms 0.87 [0.83-0.91], HR of diagnosis 0.81 [0.69-0.95]). We do not find evidence that having received a booster dose in addition to having completed a primary vaccination sequence offers additional protection over having completed the primary sequence alone (vaccinated and boosted versus vaccinated HR of symptoms 0.96 [0.91-1.01], HR of diagnosis 0.94-1.13). Our analysis of COVID-19 vaccination status modeled as a time-dependent covariate yielded similar results for patients who had completed a primary COVID-19 vaccination sequence or had completed a primary vaccination sequence and a booster dose. Both groups were on average at lower risk of developing Long COVID symptoms or being diagnosed with Long COVID than patients who where never vaccinated (vaccinated versus unvaccinated HR of symptoms 0.91 [0.88-0.95], HR of diagnosis 0.86 [0.75-0.99]; vaccinated and boosted versus unvaccinated HR of symptoms 0.88 [0.85-0.91], HR of diagnosis 0.77 [0.67-0.9]). As with the time-independent analysis, we also find that having completed a booster dose in addition to a primary COVID-19 vaccination sequence does not provide additional protection from developing Long COVID symptoms or being diagnosed with Long COVID over having completed the primary sequence alone (vaccinated and boosted versus vaccinated HR of symptoms 0.96 [0.92-1.01], HR of diagnosis 0.89 [0.76-1.06]). We find that completing a primary vaccination sequence is associated with a decreased risk of developing Long COVID symptoms or being diagnosed with Long COVID compared with no vaccination regardless of whether vaccination status is modeled as a time-independent or time-dependent covariate. We find a similar protective effect in patients who have completed a primary vaccination sequence and a booster dose when compared to the those who are unvaccinated. However, we do not find evidence for a difference in protective effect between patients who have completed a primary vaccination sequence and a booster dose and those patients who have only completed a primary vaccination sequence. Our results support the growing evidence that having complete a primary vaccination sequence is protective against the development of Long COVID symptoms or the diagnosis of Long COVID.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Clinical Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection During the Omicron Wave Using Machine Learning 96%
- Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among Those Up-to-Date and Not Up-to-Date on COVID-19 Vaccination 94%
- Durability of mRNA-1273 against COVID-19 in the time of Delta: Interim results from an observational cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of the Bivalent (Original/Omicron BA.4/BA.5) mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines mRNA-1273.222 and BNT162b2 Bivalent in Adults With Underlying Medical Conditions in the United States 94%
- Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Infections after Vaccination in North Carolina 93%
- Persistent health issues, adverse events of significant concern, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination- findings from a real-world cohort study of healthcare workers in north India 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine Boosting in Persons Already Protected by Natural or Vaccine-Induced Immunity 95%
- Necessity of COVID-19 vaccination in previously infected individuals 94%
- Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination and prior infections to reduce long COVID risk during the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization in individuals with natural, vaccine-induced and hybrid immunity: a retrospective population-based cohort study from Estonia 94%
- Seroincidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to and during the rollout of vaccines in a community-based prospective cohort of U.S. adults 93%
- Development and performance of a population-based risk stratification model for COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vaccine safety surveillance using routinely collected healthcare data – An empirical evaluation of epidemiological designs 95%
- Bias, precision and timeliness of historical (background) rate comparison methods for vaccine safety monitoring: an empirical multi-database analysis 94%
- Empirical evaluation of the sensitivity of background incidence rate characterization for adverse events across an international observational data network 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.