Genome-wide analysis of CRISPR perturbations indicates that enhancers act multiplicatively and without epistatic-like interactions
Zhou, J. L.; Guruvayurappan, K.; Chen, H. V.; Chen, A. R.; McVicker, G. P.
Show abstract
A single gene may have multiple enhancers, but how they work in concert to regulate transcription is poorly understood. To analyze enhancer interactions throughout the genome, we developed a generalized linear modeling framework, GLiMMIRS, for interrogating enhancer effects from single-cell CRISPR experiments. We applied GLiMMIRS to a published dataset and tested for interactions between 46,166 enhancer pairs and corresponding genes, including 264 high-confidence enhancer pairs. We found that enhancer effects combine multiplicatively but with limited evidence for further interactions. Only 31 enhancer pairs exhibited significant interactions (FDR < 0.1), of which none came from the high confidence subset and 20 were driven by outlier expression values. Additional analyses of a second CRISPR dataset and in silico enhancer perturbations with Enformer both support a multiplicative model of enhancer effects without interactions. Altogether, our results indicate that enhancer interactions are uncommon or have small effects that are difficult to detect. HighlightsO_LIAnalysis of a large single-cell CRISPRi screen finds limited evidence for synergistic or redundant interactions between enhancers C_LIO_LIThe collective action of multiple enhancers on a common target gene follows a multiplicative model of activity C_LIO_LIA new statistical framework for simulating and modeling data from single-cell CRISPRi screens C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Conditional resampling improves calibration and sensitivity in single cell CRISPR screen analysis 98%
- Enhancer regulatory networks globally connect non-coding breast cancer loci to cancer genes 96%
- Modelling asymmetric count ratios in CRISPR screens to decrease experiment size and improve phenotype detection 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A continuous epistasis model for predicting growth rate given combinatorial variation in gene expression and environment 96%
- Active learning of enhancer and silencer regulatory grammar in a developing neural tissue 96%
- Iterative deep learning-design of human enhancers exploits condensed sequence grammar to achieve cell type-specificity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.