Back

Phenotyping, genotyping, and prediction of abdominal pain in children using machine learning

Takahashi, K.; Shehwana, H.; Ruffle, J. K.; Williams, J. A.; Acharjee, A.; Terai, S.; Gkoutos, G. V.; Satti, H.; Aziz, Q.

2023-05-01 gastroenterology
10.1101/2023.04.26.23289185 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe exact mechanisms underlying paediatric abdominal pain (AP) remain unclear due to patient heterogeneity. This study aimed to identify AP phenotypes and develop predictive models to explore associated factors. MethodsIn 13,790 children from a large birth cohort, data on paediatric and maternal demographics and comorbidities were extracted from general practitioner records. Machine learning (ML) clustering was used to identify distinct AP phenotypes, and an ML-based predictive model was developed using demographics and clinical features. Results1,274 children experienced AP (9.2 %) (average age: 8.4 {+/-} 1.1 years, male/female: 615/659), who clustered into three distinct phenotypes: Phenotype 1 with an allergic predisposition (n = 137), Phenotype 2 with maternal comorbidities (n = 676), and Phenotype 3 with minimal other comorbidities (n = 340). As the number of allergic diseases or maternal comorbidities increased, so did the frequency of AP, with 17.6% of children with [&ge;] 3 allergic diseases and 25.6% of children with [&ge;] 3 maternal comorbidities. The predictive model demonstrated moderate performance in predicting paediatric AP (AUC 0.67), showing that a childs ethnicity, paediatric allergic diseases, and maternal comorbidities were key predictive factors. When stratified by ML-predicted probability, observed AP rates were 18.9% in the <40% group, 44.8% in the 40-50% group, 60.6% in the 50-60% group, and 100.0% in the >60% group. ConclusionsOur findings reveal distinct phenotypes and associated factors of paediatric AP by an ML approach. These insights suggest potential targets for future research to clarify the underlying mechanisms of paediatric AP.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.7%
2
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.2%
3
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.8%
6
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
9
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
11
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
16
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
17
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
28
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
29
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%