Phase-specific stimulation reveals consistent sinusoidal modulation of human corticospinal excitability along the oscillatory beta cycle
Keute, M.; Gebuehr, J.-S.; Guggenberger, R.; Trunk, B. H.; Gharabaghi, A.
Show abstract
The responsiveness of neuronal populations to incoming information fluctuates. Retrospective analyses of randomly applied stimuli reveal a neural input-output relationship along the intrinsic oscillatory cycle. Prospectively harnessing this biological mechanism would necessitate frequency- and phase-specificity, intra- and inter-individual consistency, and instantaneous access to the oscillatory cycle. We used a novel real-time approach to electroencephalography-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation to precisely target 8 equidistant phases of the oscillatory cycle in the human motor cortex of male and female healthy participants. The phase-dependency of corticospinal excitability was investigated in ten different intrinsic frequencies (4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40Hz) and indexed by motor-evoked potentials (MEP) in the corresponding forearm muscle. On both the individual and group level, we detected a consistent sinusoidal MEP modulation along the oscillatory cycle at 24Hz ({chi}22 =9.2, p=.01), but not at any other target frequency (all {chi}22 <5, all p>.08). Moreover, cross-validations showed also at 24Hz the highest consistency of the optimal phase between prospective (real-time) and retrospective (out-of-sample) testing (r=.605, p<.001), and across experimental sessions on three different days (r[≥].45). The optimal corticospinal signal transmission was at the transition from the trough to the rising flank of the oscillatory 24Hz cycle. Integrating real-time measurement and brain stimulation revealed that the sinusoidal input-output relationship of corticospinal signal transmission is frequency- and phase specific, and consistent within and across individuals and sessions. In future, this approach allows to selectively and repetitively target windows of increased responsiveness, and to thereby investigate potential cumulative effects on plasticity induction.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Test-retest reliability of intrahemispheric dorsal premotor and primary motor cortex dual-site TMS connectivity measures 97%
- Real-time optimization to enhance noninvasive cortical excitability assessment in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex 96%
- Timing-dependent synergies between noninvasive motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation in chronic cervical spinal cord injury 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation acutely lowers the response threshold of human motor circuits 97%
- Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in humans induces pupil dilation and attenuates alpha oscillations 96%
- Projection of Cortical Beta Band Oscillations to a Motor Neuron Pool Across the Full Range of Recruitment 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural excitability and sensory input determine intensity perception with opposing directions in initial cortical responses 96%
- Spatially bivariate EEG-neurofeedback can manipulate interhemispheric rebalancing of M1 excitability 95%
- Kilohertz Transcranial Magnetic Perturbation (kTMP): A New Non-invasive Method to Modulate Cortical Excitability 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.