A Two-stage Linear Mixed Model (TS-LMM) for Summary-data-based Multivariable Mendelian Randomization
Ding, M.
Show abstract
Summary-data-based multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) methods, such as MVMR-Egger, MVMR-IVW, MVMR median-based, and MVMR-PRESSO, assess the causal effects of multiple risk factors on disease. However, accounting for variances in summary statistics related to risk factors remains a challenge. We propose a linear mixed model with measurement error correction (LMM-MEC) that accounts for the variance of summary statistics for both disease outcomes and risk factors. In step I, a linear mixed model is applied to account for the variance in disease summary statistics. Specifically, if heterogeneity is present in disease summary statistics, we treat it as a random effect and adopt an iteratively re-weighted least squares algorithm to estimate causal effects. In step II, we treat the variance in the summary statistics of risk factors as multiple measurement errors and apply a regression calibration method for simultaneous multiple measurement error correction. In a simulation study, when using independent genetic variants as instrumental variables (IV), our method showed comparable performance to existing MVMR methods under conditions of no pleiotropy or balanced pleiotropy with the outcome, and it exhibited higher coverage rates and power under directional pleiotropy. Similar findings were observed when using genetic variants with low to moderate linkage disequilibrium (LD) (0 <{rho} 2 [≤] 0.3) as IVs, although coverage rates reduced for all methods compared to using independent genetic variants as IVs. In the application study, we examined causal associations between correlated cholesterol biomarkers and longevity. By including 739 genetic variants selected based on P values <5x10-5 from GWAS and allowing for low LD ({rho}2 [≤] 0.1), our method identified that large LDL-c were causally associated with lower likelihood of achieving longevity.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An integrative multi-context Mendelian randomization method for identifying risk genes across human tissues 95%
- Benchmarking Mendelian Randomization methods for causal inference using genome-wide association study summary statistics 95%
- A method to map and interpret pleiotropic loci using summary statistics of multiple traits 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comprehensive Evaluation of Methods for Mendelian Randomization Using Realistic Simulations and an Analysis of 38 Biomarkers for Risk of Type-2 Diabetes 95%
- Bias in two-sample Mendelian randomization when using heritable covariable-adjusted summary associations 95%
- An empirical investigation into the impact of winner's curse on estimates from Mendelian randomization 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Hierarchical Approach Using Marginal Summary Statistics for Multiple Intermediates in a Mendelian Randomization or Transcriptome Analysis 96%
- A structural mean modelling Mendelian randomization approach to investigate the lifecourse effect of adiposity: applied and methodological considerations 92%
- Analyses using multiple imputation need to consider missing data in auxiliary variables 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.