Statistical Analysis Plan for the Blood Pressure Postpartum (BP2) study
Brew, B. K.; Chambers, G. M.; Kotevski, D.; Henry, A.; BP2 Steering Committee,
Show abstract
BackgroundHypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy (HDP) complicate 5-10% of pregnancies globally: 2-5% preeclampsia, 3% gestational hypertension, and 0.5-2% chronic hypertension. It is epidemiologically well established that adverse health effects of HDP do not end with the pregnancy: these conditions are associated with increased lifetime cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks. However, intervention trial data in the early years postpartum after HDP, focussed on early intervention to reduce womens ongoing CVD risks after HDP, is sparse. MethodsThe Blood Pressure Postpartum Trial (BP2) is a 3-arm randomised controlled trial investigating three different methods of follow-up and lifestyle behaviour change in the first 12 months postpartum following a pregnancy affected by HDP. The trial was prospectively registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical trials registry (registration: ACTRN12618002004246) and the study protocol has previously been published (Henry A et al, Pregnancy Hypertension 2020; 22: 1-6). This manuscript details the pre-analysis, pre-specified Statistical Analysis Plan.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world effects of ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: protocol for an emulation study of the ONTARGET trial using electronic health records 95%
- A randomised controlled trial of preconception lifestyle intervention on maternal and offspring health in people with increased risk of gestational diabetes: study protocol for the BEFORE THE BEGINNING trial 95%
- Unpacking the behavioural components and delivery features of early childhood obesity prevention interventions in the TOPCHILD Collaboration: a systematic review and intervention coding protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): Protocol of a cluster randomised controlled equivalence trial of prescribing policy to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension. 94%
- Controlled evaLuation of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for COVID-19 respIraTorY disease (CLARITY): Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled Bayesian adaptive sample size trial 94%
- The iHealth-T2D study: Statistical analysis plan for a cluster randomised controlled trial with intensive family-based lifestyle modification programme to reduce type 2 diabetes risk amongst South Asians 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Eating Disorders In weight-related Therapy (EDIT): Protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis of eating disorder risk in behavioural weight management 94%
- Menopause education of healthcare professionals: A scoping review protocol 93%
- How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of digital technology tools to examine patient adherence to a prescription omega-3 polyunsaturated acids therapy intended to mitigate cardiovascular risk: protocol and preliminary demographic data from the DIAPAsOn prospective observational study 93%
- The Womens Wellness After Giving Birth Program (WWAGBP) for Vietnamese women: A single-arm trial protocol 92%
- Population-Based Sero-Epidemiological Study Protocol For The Impact Of Smoking On SARS-COV-2 Infection And COVID-19 Outcomes – The Troina Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Corticosteroids for improving patient relevant outcomes in HELLP syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Monitoring One Heart to Help Two: Heart Rate Variability and Resting Heart Rate using Wearable Technology in Active Women Across the Perinatal Period 93%
- A Cross-Sectional Survey Of Australian Women'S Perspectives And Experiences Of Exercise During Pregnancy, Including Women That Experience Mental Illness 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.