Data-driven extraction of unstructured electronic health records to evaluate glioblastoma treatment patterns
Swaminathan, A.; Ren, A.; Wu, J. Y.; Bhargava-Shah, A.; Lopez, I.; Srivastava, U.; Alexopoulos, V.; Pizzitola, R.; Bui, B.; Alkhani, L.; Lee, S.; Mohit, N.; Seo, N.; Macedo, N.; Cheng, W.; Wang, W.; Tran, E.; Thomas, R.; Gevaert, O.
Show abstract
BackgroundData on lines of therapy (LOTs) for cancer treatment is important for clinical oncology research, but LOTs are not explicitly recorded in EHRs. We present an efficient approach for clinical data abstraction and a flexible algorithm to derive LOTs from EHR-based medication data on patients with glioblastoma (GBM). MethodsNon-clinicians were trained to abstract the diagnosis of GBM from EHRs, and their accuracy was compared to abstraction performed by clinicians. The resulting data was used to build a cohort of patients with confirmed GBM diagnosis. An algorithm was developed to derive LOTs using structured medication data, accounting for the addition and discontinuation of therapies and drug class. Descriptive statistics were calculated and time-to-next-treatment analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. ResultsTreating clinicians as the gold standard, non-clinicians abstracted GBM diagnosis with sensitivity 0.98, specificity 1.00, PPV 1.00, and NPV 0.90, suggesting that non-clinician abstraction of GBM diagnosis was comparable to clinician abstraction. Out of 693 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of GBM, 246 patients contained structured information about the types of medications received. Of those, 165 (67.1%) received a first-line therapy (1L) of temozolomide, and the median time-to-next-treatment from the start of 1L was 179 days. ConclusionsWe also developed a flexible, interpretable, and easy-to-implement algorithm to derive LOTs given EHR data on medication orders and administrations that can be used to create high-quality datasets for outcomes research. We also showed that the cost of chart abstraction can be reduced by training non-clinicians instead of clinicians. Importance of the studyThis study proposes an efficient and accurate method to extract unstructured data from electronic health records (EHRs) for cancer outcomes research. The study addresses the limitations of manual abstraction of unstructured clinical data and presents a reproducible, low-cost workflow for clinical data abstraction and a flexible algorithm to derive lines of therapy (LOTs) from EHR-based structured medication data. The LOT data was used to conduct a descriptive treatment pattern analysis and a time-to-next-treatment analysis to demonstrate how EHR-derived unstructured data can be transformed to answer diverse clinical research questions. The study also investigates the feasibility of training non-clinicians to perform abstraction of GBM data, demonstrating that with detailed explanations of clinical documentation, best practices for chart review, and quantitative evaluation of abstraction performance, similar data quality to abstraction performed by clinicians can be achieved. The findings of this study have important implications for improving cancer outcomes research and facilitating the analysis of EHR-derived treatment data.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Missing data in the medical record for oncology patients: prevalence and association with outcomes 93%
- Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models 91%
- Diagnostic Codes in AI prediction models and Label Leakage of Same-admission Clinical Outcomes 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Prognosis and IDH Mutation Status for Patients with Lower-Grade Gliomas Using Whole Slide Images 93%
- Comparison of Radiomic Feature Aggregation Methods for Patients with Multiple Tumors 93%
- Development and Characterization of Patient-Derived Xenografts from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol of the observational study STRATUM-OS: First step in the development and validation of the STRATUM tool based on multimodal data processing to assist surgery in patients affected by intra-axial brain tumours 91%
- Reproducibility and transparency characteristics of oncology research evidence 91%
- Development and validation of multivariable machine learning algorithms to predict risk of cancer in symptomatic patients referred urgently from primary care 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.