Assessing the Potential of USMLE-Like Exam Questions Generated by GPT-4
Fleming, S. L.; Morse, K.; Kumar, A. M.; Chiang, C.-C.; Patel, B.; Brunskill, E. P.; Shah, N.
Show abstract
The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) is a critical step in assessing the competence of future physicians, yet the process of creating exam questions and study materials is both time-consuming and costly. While Large Language Models (LLMs), such as OpenAIs GPT-4, have demonstrated proficiency in answering medical exam questions, their potential in generating such questions remains underexplored. This study presents QUEST-AI, a novel system that utilizes LLMs to (1) generate USMLE-style questions, (2) identify and flag incorrect questions, and (3) correct errors in the flagged questions. We evaluated this systems output by constructing a test set of 50 LLM-generated questions mixed with 50 human-generated questions and conducting a two-part assessment with three physicians and two medical students. The assessors attempted to distinguish between LLM and human-generated questions and evaluated the validity of the LLM-generated content. A majority of exam questions generated by QUEST-AI were deemed valid by a panel of three clinicians, with strong correlations between performance on LLM-generated and human-generated questions. This pioneering application of LLMs in medical education could significantly increase the ease and efficiency of developing USMLE-style medical exam content, offering a cost-effective and accessible alternative for exam preparation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation 94%
- From Tool to Teammate: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Clinician-AI Collaborative Workflows for Diagnosis 93%
- Evaluating large language model workflows in clinical decision support: referral, triage, and diagnosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 94%
- Performance of ChatGPT on Chinese National Medical Licensing Examinations: A Five-Year Examination Evaluation Study for Physicians, Pharmacists and Nurses 94%
- Evaluation of Statistical Illiteracy in Latin American Clinicians and of the Efficacy of a 10-Hour Course 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.