Spatially-resolved profiling of the T-cell receptor repertoire in archival clinical specimens using FUME-TCRseq
Baker, A.-M.; Nageswaran, G.; Nenclares, P.; Ronel, T.; Smith, K.; Kimberley, C.; Lacle, M. M.; Bhide, S.; Harrington, K. J.; Melcher, A.; Rodriguez-Justo, M.; Chain, B.; Graham, T. A.
Show abstract
Genomic analysis of the T-cell receptor (TCR) reveals the strength, breadth and clonal dynamics of the adaptive immune response to pathogens or cancer. The diversity of the TCR repertoire, however, means that sequencing is technically challenging, particularly for samples with low quality, degraded nucleic acids. Here, we have developed and validated FUME-TCRseq, a robust and sensitive RNA-based TCR sequencing methodology that is suitable for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples and low amounts of input material. FUME-TCRseq incorporates unique molecular identifiers into each molecule of cDNA, allowing correction for sequencing errors and PCR bias. We used RNA extracted from colorectal and head and neck cancers to benchmark the accuracy and sensitivity of FUME-TCRseq against existing methods, and found excellent concordance between the datasets. Furthermore, FUME-TCRseq detected more clonotypes than a commercial RNA-based alternative, with shorter library preparation time and significantly lower cost. The high sensitivity and the ability to sequence RNA of poor quality and limited amount enables quantitative analysis of small numbers of cells from archival tissue sections, which is not possible with other methods. To demonstrate this we performed spatially-resolved FUME-TCRseq of colorectal cancers using macrodissected archival samples, revealing the shifting T-cell landscapes at the transition to an invasive phenotype, and between tumour subclones containing distinct driver alterations. In summary, FUME-TCRseq represents an accurate, sensitive and low-cost tool for the characterisation of T-cell repertoires, particularly in samples with low quality RNA that have not been accessible using existing methodology.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Type I interferon drives a cellular state inert to TCR-stimulation and could impede effective T-cell differentiation in cancer 93%
- A novel cryopreservation and biobanking strategy to study lymphoid tissue stromal cells in human disease 93%
- Investigating Polyreactivity of CD4+ T Cells to the Intestinal Microbiota 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A framework to identify antigen-expanded T Cell Receptor (TCR) clusters within complex repertoires 94%
- Deep sequencing of B cell receptor repertoires from COVID-19 patients reveals strong convergent immune signatures 94%
- BCR, not TCR, repertoire diversity is associated with favorable COVID-19 prognosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell long-read targeted sequencing reveals transcriptional variation in ovarian cancer 94%
- Partner-independent fusion gene detection by multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9 enrichment and long-read Nanopore sequencing 94%
- Single-cell sequencing reveals a clonal expansion of pro-inflammatory synovial CD8 T cells expressing tissue homing receptors in psoriatic arthritis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Short and long-read genome sequencing methodologies for somatic variant detection; genomic analysis of a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma 95%
- A CAR RNA FISH assay to study functional and spatial heterogeneity of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in tissue 94%
- Blood transcriptomics analysis offers insights into variant-specific immune response to SARS-CoV-2 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic evaluation of intratumoral and peripheral BCR repertoires in three cancers 94%
- Patient-derived xenografts and single-cell sequencing identifies three subtypes of tumor-reactive lymphocytes in uveal melanoma metastases 94%
- The use of non-functional clonotypes as a natural calibrator for quantitative bias correction in adaptive immune receptor repertoire profiling 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.