Bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation normalises learning rate adjustment in low mood
Sarrazin, V.; Overman, M. J.; Mezossy-Dona, L.; Browning, M.; O'Shea, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has mild to moderate antidepressant effects. Little is known about the mechanisms of action. Other antidepressant treatments have been shown to act in part by reducing negative biases, which are thought to play a causal role in the maintenance of depression. Negative biases are hypothesized to stem from aberrant reinforcement learning processes, more precisely from overestimation of the informativeness of negative outcomes. The aim of this study was to test whether bifrontal tDCS might normalise such aberrant reinforcement learning processes in depressed mood. Methods85 community volunteers with low mood received tDCS during (or before) the performance of a reinforcement learning task that manipulated the informativeness (volatility) of positive and negative outcomes. In two sessions participants received real or sham tDCS in counter-balanced order. Baseline performance (sham tDCS) was compared to a sample of healthy individuals (n = 40) to identify the effect of low mood on task performance. The impact of tDCS on task performance was assessed by contrasting real and sham tDCS. ResultsLow mood was characterised by decreased adjustment of loss relative to win learning rates in response to changes in informativeness. Bifrontal tDCS applied during task performance normalised this deficit by increasing the adjustment of loss learning rates to informativeness. Bifrontal tDCS applied before task performance had no effect indicating that the stimulation effect is cognitive state dependent. ConclusionsOur study provides preliminary evidence that bifrontal tDCS can normalise aberrant reinforcement learning processes in low mood. Crucially, this was only the case if stimulation was applied during task performance, suggesting that combining tDCS with a concurrent cognitive manipulation might increase the functional impact on cognitive functions and potentially on emotional symptoms. Future studies are needed to test if the effect on learning processes might have a beneficial effect on mood itself.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Negative affective traits moderate transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on memory 96%
- Hypoactivation of ventromedial frontal cortex in major depressive disorder: an MEG study of the Reward Positivity 94%
- Reduction in left frontal alpha oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation in major depressive disorder is context-dependent in a randomized-clinical trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intensity-dependent effects of tDCS on motor learning are related to dopamine 95%
- Intensified stimulation targeting lateral and medial prefrontal cortices for the treatment of social anxiety disorder: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-comparison study 95%
- A Genetic Profile of Refractory Individuals with Major Depressive Disorder and Their Responsiveness to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeting the prefrontal-supplementary motor network in obsessive-compulsive disorder with intensified electrical stimulation in two dosages: A randomized, controlled trial 94%
- Magnetic seizure therapy and electroconvulsive therapy increase frontal aperiodic activity 94%
- Computational Mechanisms Underlying Multi-Step Planning Deficits in Methamphetamine Use Disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep brain stimulation in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis: a symptom provocation study in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder 94%
- Unilateral and Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Follow up on a Naturalistic Observation Study 93%
- Transient frontal spectral events from EEG predict antidepressant response to sertraline in depression 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.