Force tuning explains changes in phasic dopamine signaling during stimulus-reward learning
Bakhurin, K. I.; Hughes, R. N.; Jiang, Q.; Fallon, I. P.; Yin, H.
Show abstract
According to a popular hypothesis, phasic dopamine (DA) activity encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) necessary for reinforcement learning. However, recent work showed that DA neurons are necessary for performance rather than learning. One limitation of previous work on phasic DA signaling and RPE is the limited behavioral measures. Here, we measured subtle force exertion while recording and manipulating DA activity in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) during stimulus-reward learning. We found two major populations of DA neurons that increased firing before forward and backward force exertion. Force tuning is the same regardless of learning, reward predictability, or outcome valence. Changes in the pattern of force exertion can explain results traditionally used to support the RPE hypothesis, such as modulation by reward magnitude, probability, and unpredicted reward delivery or omission. Thus VTA DA neurons are not used to signal RPE but to regulate force exertion during motivated behavior.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mixed representations of choice direction and outcome by GABA/glutamate cotransmitting neurons in the entopeduncular nucleus 98%
- Stimulation of VTA dopamine inputs to LH upregulates orexin neuronal activity in a DRD2-dependent manner 97%
- Infralimbic parvalbumin neural activity facilitates cued threat avoidance 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Ventral pallidum GABA and glutamate neurons drive approach and avoidance through distinct modulation of VTA cell types 97%
- Supramammillary neurons projecting to the septum regulate dopamine and motivation for environmental interaction 97%
- Parallel processing of working memory and temporal information by distinct types of cortical projection neurons 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.