Back

The effect of developmental variation on expression QTLs in a multi parental C. elegans population

van Eijnatten, A. L.; Sterken, M. G.; Kammenga, J.; Nijveen, H.; Snoek, B. L.

2023-04-21 genetics
10.1101/2023.04.21.537811 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Regulation of gene expression plays a crucial role in the development and adaptation of organisms to changing environments. A population-based procedure used to investigate the genetic regulation of gene expression is eQTL mapping. Typically, the age of the population used for eQTL mapping at the time of sampling is strictly controlled. This is necessary because the developmental process causes changes in gene expression, complicating the interpretation of eQTL mapping experiments. However, organisms can differ in their "developmental age", even if they are of the same chronological age. As a result, eQTL patterns are affected by uncontrolled developmental variation in gene expression. The model organism C. elegans is particularly suited for studying the effect of developmental variation on eQTL mapping patterns. In a span of days C. elegans transitions from embryo through four larval stages to adult while undergoing massive changes to its transcriptome. Here we use C. elegans to investigate the effect of developmental age variation on eQTL patterns and an available normalization procedure. We used dynamical eQTL mapping, which includes developmental age as a cofactor, to separate the variation in development from genotypic variation and explain variation in gene expression levels. We compare classical single marker eQTL mapping and dynamical eQTL mapping using RNA-seq data of [~]200 multi-parental recombinant inbred lines of C. elegans. The results show that many eQTLs are actually caused by developmental variation, that most trans-bands are associated with developmental age and that dynamical eQTL mapping detects additional eQTLs not found with classical eQTL mapping.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.