Back

Quantitative liver health imaging improves clinical outcomes in colorectal liver metastasis surgery.

Welsh, F. K.; Sethi, P.; Sundaravadanan, S.; Cresswell, B.; Connell, J. J.; Knapp, S.; Brady, J. M.; Banerjee, R.; Rees, M.

2023-04-25 oncology
10.1101/2023.04.21.23288453 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPost-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), driven by insufficient volume and quality of the remnant liver following an operation, is a significant clinical problem that is currently underserved by pre-operative assessment methods. Clinical management and a patients recovery from post-operative liver related complications results in a protracted stay in hospital. Methods91 patients with colorectal liver metastasis being considered for liver resection were recruited onto the Precision1 trial. The imaging report from an additional non-quantitative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) scan was examined and used to alter surgical decision making. Patient outcomes were monitored and evaluated against a standard of care comparator dataset blinded to mpMRI scan results. ResultsPreviously undiagnosed liver disease activity or elevated liver fat was detected using mpMRI in 23% of patients, whereas the liver health was unexpectedly good in 7% of patients; this resulted in a change to surgical plan in 29% of cases. The incidence of protracted (over 14 days) length of stay was reduced from 5% to 1% following the introduction of mpMRI reports into surgical decision-making process. ConclusionmpMRI is a safe method to evaluate liver health in patients being considered for liver resection. Surgical decision making can be altered to achieve a safer treatment strategy resulting in shorter hospital stays for patients.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
2
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
4
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
8
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
12
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
14
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
19
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
30
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%