Back

Genetic basis of aposematic coloration in a mimetic radiation of poison frogs

Linderoth, T.; Aguilar-Gomez, D.; White, E.; Twomey, E.; Stuckert, A.; Bi, K.; Ko, A.; Graham, N.; Rocha, J. L.; Chang, J.; MacManes, M. D.; Summers, K.; Nielsen, R.

2023-04-21 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.04.20.537757 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The evolution of mimicry in a single species or population has rippling inter and intraspecific effects across ecological communities, providing a fascinating mechanism of phenotypic diversification. In this study we present the first identification of genes underlying Mullerian mimicry in a vertebrate, the Peruvian mimic poison frog, Ranitomeya imitator. We sequenced 124 R. imitator exomes and discovered loci with both strong divergence between different mimetic morphs and phenotypic associations within an intraspecific admixture zone, implicating mc1r, asip, bsn, retsat, and krt8.2 in the evolution of mimetic color phenotypes. We confirmed these associations for most candidate genes through linkage mapping in a lab-reared pedigree. We also sequenced transcriptomes from the model species, allowing tests for introgression and revealing that the mimetic resemblance between R. imitator and the models evolved independently. Selection analyses of the candidate genes show that the mimicry phenotypes likely have evolved through selective sweeps acting on polygenic variation. Our results suggest that the evolutionary origins and molecular mechanisms underlying mimicry phenotypes in vertebrates may be radically different from those previously documented in invertebrates such as the iconic Heliconius butterfly mimicry complex. One Sentence SummaryMullerian mimicry evolved through independent selective sweeps on color and pattern loci in the mimic poison frog.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.