A unified framework for nonparametric causality detection
Osada, Y.; Ushio, M.; Michio, K.
Show abstract
Most complex systems in the real world are driven by multiple interactions among components. Identifying these interactions is critical for understanding, forecasting, and controlling system-level phenomena. Transfer entropy (TE) and convergent cross mapping (CCM) are two widely-used approaches for nonparametric causality detection based on time-series data. However, the theoretical relationship between TE and CCM has not been formally explained. Here, we provide a theoretical formulation that links TE and CCM in an information-theoretic framework, showing that they have different definitions of causal influence. Furthermore, from the formulation, we propose a novel nonparametric causality test, named unified information-theoretic causality (UIC), which has lower data requirements than those of TE (due to robustness to noise) and lower false-positive rates than those of CCM. Numerical experiments confirmed that UIC outperforms TE and CCM in terms of the performance of causality detection for both linear and nonlinear dynamical systems. Finally, we demonstrate the practical importance of the conditional test based on UIC using numerical simulations with indirect causality and empirical data for microbial communities in irrigated water samples from rice fields. Our results contribute to a unified understanding of nonparametric causality tests in time series and the accurate reconstruction of complex real-world systems.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuro-Cognitive Multilevel Causal Modeling: A Framework that Bridges the Explanatory Gap between Neuronal Activity and Cognition 94%
- Accuracy of the Lotka-Volterra Model fails in strongly coupled microbial consumer-resource systems 93%
- Robust point-process Granger causality analysis in presence of exogenous temporal modulations and trial-by-trial variability in spike trains. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.