Back

Single-cell temporal dynamics reveals the relative contributions of transcription and degradation to cell-type specific gene expression in zebrafish embryos

Fishman, L.; Nechooshtan, G.; Erhard, F.; Regev, A.; Farrell, J. A.; Rabani, M.

2023-04-21 genomics
10.1101/2023.04.20.537620 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractDuring embryonic development, pluripotent cells assume specialized identities by adopting particular gene expression profiles. However, systematically dissecting the underlying regulation of mRNA transcription and degradation remains a challenge, especially within whole embryos with diverse cellular identities. Here, we collect temporal cellular transcriptomes of zebrafish embryos, and decompose them into their newly-transcribed (zygotic) and pre-existing (maternal) mRNA components by combining single-cell RNA-Seq and metabolic labeling. We introduce kinetic models capable of quantifying regulatory rates of mRNA transcription and degradation within individual cell types during their specification. These reveal different regulatory rates between thousands of genes, and sometimes between cell types, that shape spatio-temporal expression patterns. Transcription drives most cell-type restricted gene expression. However, selective retention of maternal transcripts helps to define the gene expression profiles of germ cells and enveloping layer cells, two of the earliest specified cell-types. Coordination between transcription and degradation restricts expression of maternal-zygotic genes to specific cell types or times, and allows the emergence of spatio-temporal patterns when overall mRNA levels are held relatively constant. Sequence-based analysis links differences in degradation to specific sequence motifs. Our study reveals mRNA transcription and degradation events that control embryonic gene expression, and provides a quantitative approach to study mRNA regulation during a dynamic spatio-temporal response.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.