Phase-specific stimulation of the human brain with real-time measurement instead of prediction
Guggenberger, R.; Gebuehr, J.-S.; Keute, M.; Gharabaghi, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe responsiveness of the human brain to external input fluctuates. Timing the external perturbation with regard to the oscillatory brain state may improve the intended stimulation effects. However, current brain state-dependent interventions targeting phases of the oscillatory cycle need to apply prediction algorithms to compensate for latencies between measurement and stimulation, and are therefore imprecise. ObjectiveWe investigated the phase-specific precision of a novel non-predictive approach on the basis of integrated real-time measurement and brain stimulation. MethodsApplying a simulation, we estimated the circular standard deviation (SD) to hit 2, 4, 8, 16 or 32 equidistant phase bins of the oscillatory cycle with high precision. Furthermore, we used electroencephalography-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects to empirically determine the precision of hitting the targeted phase of the oscillatory cycle for 10 different frequencies from 4Hz to 40Hz using our approach. ResultsThe simulation revealed that SDs of less than 17.6{degrees}, 9.7{degrees}, 5.1{degrees}, 2.5{degrees}, and 1.3{degrees} were necessary to precisely hit 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 distinct phase bins of the oscillatory cycle. By completing measurement, signal-processing and stimulation with a round-time of 1ms, our empirical approach achieved SDs of 0.4{degrees} at 4Hz to 4.3{degrees} at 40Hz. This facilitates selective targeting of 32 phases (at 4Hz), 16 phases (at 8, 12, 16, 20, 24Hz) and 8 phases (at 28, 32, 36, 40Hz), respectively. ConclusionIntegrated real-time measurement and stimulation circumvents the need for prediction and results in more precise phase-specific brain stimulation than with state-of-the-art procedures.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effective correction of extreme capacitive artifacts in TMS-EEG via windowed detrending 95%
- Towards adaptive deep brain stimulation: clinical and technical notes on a novel commercial device for chronic brain sensing 95%
- Optimized Monophasic Pulses with Equivalent Electric Field for Rapid-Rate Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The rt-TEP tool: real-time visualization of TMS-Evoked Potential to maximize cortical activation and minimize artifacts 96%
- TAAC - TMS Adaptable Auditory Control: a universal tool to mask TMS click 95%
- Proper reference selection and re-referencing to mitigate bias in single pulse electrical stimulation data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated search of stimulation targets with closed-loop transcranial magnetic stimulation 95%
- Stimulation Artifact Source Separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) 95%
- Recognizing EEG responses to active TMS vs. sham stimulations in different TMS-EEG datasets: a machine learning approach 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.