Persistent Nav1.6 current drives spinal locomotor functions through nonlinear dynamics
Drouillas, B.; Brocard, C.; zanella, S.; Bos, R.; Brocard, F.
Show abstract
Persistent sodium current (INaP) in the spinal locomotor network promotes two distinct nonlinear firing patterns: a self-sustained spiking triggered by a brief excitation in bistable motoneurons and bursting oscillations in interneurons of the central pattern generator (CPG). Here, we identified the NaV channels responsible for INaP and their role in motor behaviors. We report the axonal Nav1.6 as the main molecular player for INaP in lumbar motoneurons. The motoneuronal inhibition of Nav1.6, but not of Nav1.1, impairs INaP, bistability, postural tone and locomotor performance. In interneurons of the CPG region, Nav1.6 with Nav1.1 equally mediate INaP and the inhibition of both channels is required to abolish oscillatory bursting activities and the locomotor rhythm. Overall, Nav1.6 plays a significant role both in posture and locomotion by governing INaP-dependent bistability in motoneurons and working in tandem with Nav1.1 to provide INaP-dependent rhythmogenic properties of the CPG.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Regulation of coordinated muscular relaxation by a pattern-generating intersegmental circuit 96%
- Hierarchical regulation of functionally antagonistic neuropeptides expressed in a single neuron pair 96%
- A synaptic novelty signal to switch hippocampal attractor networks from generalization to discrimination 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuroepithelial progenitors generate and propagate non-neuronal action potentials across the spinal cord 97%
- Spinal V1 neurons inhibit motor targets locally and sensory targets distally to coordinate locomotion 96%
- Spinal sensory neurons project onto hindbrain to stabilize posture and enhance locomotor speed 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.