Computer vision, causal inference and public health modelling approaches to generate evidence on the impacts of urban planning in non-communicable disease and health inequalities in UK and Australian cities: A proposed collaborative approach
Hunter, R. F.; Garcia, L.; Stevenson, M.; Nice, K.; Wijnands, J.; Kee, F.; Ellis, G.; Anderson, N.; Seneviratne, S.; Moeinaddini, M.; Godic, B.; Akaraci, S.; Thompson, J. H.
Show abstract
BackgroundGiven that the majority of the worlds population live in cities, it is essential to global health efforts that we design them in ways that both reduce non-communicable diseases (NCDs) risk and that facilitate adoption and maintenance of healthy lifestyles. Current approaches tend to focus on the relationship between urban design-related factors that affect health at the local or neighbourhood level but few studies have explored this relationship both within and across entire cities, nor explored the causal pathways between urban-designed related factors and NCDs. The aim of this research program is to use computer vision, causal inference, and public health modelling methods for understanding the causal relationship between urban design and health at the neighbourhood level, and to explore intervention approaches at the city scale. MethodsPhase 1 will use machine learning and computer vision techniques to analyse gridded, local-level aerial images (with an optical resolution of <20cm), of all UK and Australian cities with populations over 100,000. It will identify a variety of urban features within these images and derive associations between them and NCD incidence and risk factors identified through location-based health surveys. Phase 2, using data from prospective health cohorts and linked objective built environment data, will apply Bayesian networks to investigate the possible causal pathways between built environment, lifestyle factors, and NCD incidence. Phase 3 will estimate the health impacts of actionable changes in urban design. Using health impact assessment modelling, we will calculate the NCD burden that could be prevented if cities were to adopt urban features of healthier counterparts. A similar approach will be applied on finer-grained scale within all case study cities, enabling assessment of health impacts of changes in individual locations. Phase 4 will develop an interactive web-based toolkit to enable urban designers, planners and policymakers to inform the decision-making cycle, co-designed with intended users involving participatory workshops. DiscussionWe use state-of-the-art approaches to: (i) generate evidence on the impacts of urban planning and design in NCDs and health inequalities in UK and Australian cities, and (ii) provide stakeholders with tools for advocacy and designing healthier cities. Trial registrationNot applicable.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Deep Recurrent Reinforced Learning model to compare the efficacy of targeted local vs. national measures on the spread of COVID-19 in the UK 93%
- Street images classification according to COVID-19 risk in Lima, Peru: A convolutional neural networks analysis 92%
- Cohort Profile: Health and Attainment of Pupils in a Primary Education National-Cohort (HAPPEN). A hybrid total population cohort in Wales, UK 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
- A tree-planting decision support tool for urban heat island mitigation 93%
- Rural Roads to Cognitive Resilience (RRR): A prospective cohort study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 94%
- Urban pandemic response: survey results describing the experiences from twenty-five cities during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining participatory mapping and route optimization algorithms to inform the delivery of community health interventions at the last mile 93%
- Conversational, Longitudinal, Ecological Assessment (CLEA): Exploring a new AI-driven method for qualitative data collection in a behavioural health context 91%
- Population Analysis Of Mortality Risk: Predictive Models Using Motion Sensors For 100,000 Participants In The UK Biobank National Cohort 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 93%
- InterMob: A 24-month randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of an intervention including behavioural change techniques and free transport versus an intervention including air pollution awareness-raising on car use reduction among regular car users living in Grenoble, France 92%
- How is the COVID-19 pandemic impacting our life, mental health, and well-being? Design and preliminary findings of the pan-Canadian longitudinal COHESION Study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.