Back

Post-COVID-19 syndrome and insulin resistance 20 months after a mild COVID-19

FIERRO, P.; MARTIN, D.; PARIENTE-RODRIGO, E.; GARCIA-GARRIDO, A.; BASTERRECHEA, H.; PETITTA, B.; BIANCONI, C.; HERRAN, S.; BERRUETA, A.; JORRIN, A.; GOMEZ-PEREZ, A.; CASADO, R.; CUADRADO, A.; RAMOS-BARRON, C.; HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, J. L.

2023-04-19 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.04.17.23288637 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveSARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with impaired glucose metabolism. Although the mechanisms are not fully understood, insulin resistance (IR) appears to be a central factor. Patients who had a severe acute phase, but even asymptomatic or with mild COVID-19, have an increased risk of T2DM. After the acute phase, post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) also seems to be related to this metabolic disturbance, but there is a paucity of studies. This study aims to evaluate a possible relationship between PCS and IR after mild COVID-19 and, if confirmed, whether there are differences by sex. Subjects and methodsRetrospective observational cohort study including subjects who had mild COVID-19 between April and September 2020 in a community setting. None had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 at inclusion, and previous T2DM and liver disease were exclusion criteria. Patients who met NICE criteria were classified as PCS+. Epidemiological and laboratory data were analysed. Three assessments were performed: 1E (pre-COVID-19, considered baseline and reference for comparisons), 2E (approximately 3 months after the acute phase), and 3E (approximately 20 months after the acute phase). A triglyceride-to-glucose (TyG) index [&ge;]8.74 was considered IR. Albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were assessed as inflammatory markers. Bivariate analyses were performed, using nonparametric and repeated measures tests. A subsample without metabolic disorder or CVD (age<median, BMI<25 kg/m2, elevated AGR, TyG index=7.80 [0.5]) was generated to reasonably rule out prior baseline IR that could bias the results. The relationships between PCS and TyG in 3E (TyG3) were modeled in 8 multiple regressions, stratifying by sex and BMI combinations. ResultsA total of 112 subjects (median [IQR] of age= 44 [20] years; 65 women) were analysed. Up to 14.3% was obese and 17% was hypertensive. Significant increases between 1E and 3E were registered regarding (i) basal glycemia (BG), 87 [14] mg/dL vs. 89 [14]; p=0.014, (ii) TyG index (8.25 [0.8] vs. 8.32 [0.7]; p=0.002), and (iii) LDH in 3rd tertile (16.1% vs 32.1%; p=0.007). A total of 8 previously normoglycemic subjects, showed BG2 or BG3 >126 mg/dL. The subgroups with IR highest prevalence at 3E were those of BMI [&ge;]25 kg/m2 and PCS+. The subgroup without CVD presented a significant increase in the TyG index (TyG1=7.80 [0.1] vs. TyG3= 8.28 [0.1]; p=0.017). LDH1 was significantly correlated with TyG3 in both sexes (rho=0.214 in women, rho=0.298 in men); in contrast, LDH2 and LDH3 did not present such an association. In multivariable analysis, PCS has shown to be an independent and predictive variable of TyG index in women with BMI<25 kg/m2, after adjustment for age, hypertension, BMI, Charlson comorbidity index, AGR1, AGR2, LDH1, number of symptoms of acute COVID-19, and number of days of the acute episode ({beta}=0.350; p=0.039). ConclusionsPCS has played a secondary role in predicting IR, showing a modest effect compared to BMI or prior hypertension. A significant increase in IR has been noted 20 months after mild COVID-19, both in cases of previous baseline IR and in those without previous IR. Basal serum LDH has shown to be predictive of current TyG, regardless of elevated LDH after SARS-CoV-2 infection. There were profound differences between women and men, confirming the need for a sex-stratified analysis when addressing the relation between PCS and glycemic alterations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.