Comparison of a custom Photogrammetry for Anatomical CarE (PHACE) system with other Low- Cost Facial Scanning Devices
To, J. K.; Vu, A. N.; Ediriwickrema, L. S.; Browne, A. W.
Show abstract
PurposeTo compare a custom Photogrammetry for Anatomical CarE (PHACE) system with other cost-effective 3-dimensional (3D) facial scanning systems to objectively characterize morphology and volume of periorbital and adnexal anatomy. MethodsThe imaging systems evaluated include the low-cost custom PHACE system and commercial software product for the iPhone called Scandy Pro (iScandy) application (Scandy, USA), and the mid-priced Einscan Pro 2X (Shining3D Technologies, China) device and Array of Reconstructed Cameras 7 (ARC7) facial scanner (Bellus3D, USA). Imaging was performed on a manikin facemask and humans with various Fitzpatrick scores. Scanner attributes were assessed using mesh density, reproducibility, surface deviation, and emulation of 3D printed phantom lesions affixed above the superciliary arch (brow line). ResultsThe Einscan served as a reference for lower cost imaging systems because it qualitatively and quantitatively renders facial morphology with the highest mesh density, reproducibility (0.13 {+/-} 0.10 mm), and volume recapitulation (approximately 2% of 33.5 L). Compared to the Einscan, the PHACE system (0.35 {+/-} 0.03 mm, 0.33 {+/-} 0.16 mm) demonstrated non-inferior mean accuracy and reproducibility root mean square (RMS) compared to the iScandy (0.42 {+/-} 0.13 mm, 0.58 {+/-} 0.09 mm), and significantly more expensive ARC7 (0.42 {+/-} 0.03 mm, 0.26 {+/-} 0.09 mm). Similarly, the PHACE system showed non-inferior volumetric modeling when rendering a 124 L phantom lesion compared to the iScandy and more costly ARC7 (mean percent difference from the Einscan: 4.68 {+/-} 3.73%, 9.09 {+/-} 0.94%, and 21.99 {+/-} 17.91% respectively). ConclusionsThe affordable PHACE system accurately measures periorbital soft tissue as well as other established mid-cost facial scanning systems. Additionally, the portability, affordability, and adaptability of PHACE can facilitate widespread adoption of 3D facial anthropometric technology as an objective measurement tool in ophthalmology. PrecisWe demonstrate a custom system for facial photogrammetry (Photogrammetry for Anatomical CarE -PHACE) to produce 3D renderings of facial volume and morphology which compares with more expensive alternative 3D scanning technologies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Low-cost, Smartphone-based Specular Imaging and Automated Analysis of the Corneal Endothelium 94%
- Automatic Measurements of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements by Video-Oculography and Deep Learning-Based Object Detection 94%
- Automated Assessment of Choroidal Mass Dimensions Using Static and Dynamic Ultrasonographic Imaging 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of Collaborative Robot-assisted Cutting Method for Iliac Crest Flap Raising: Randomized Crossover Trial 93%
- Collection of 2429 constrained headshots of 277 volunteers for deep learning 92%
- Multi-center Clinical Study Using Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluation of Cervical Lesions In-vivo 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Autonomous Screening for Laser Photocoagulation in Fundus Images Using Deep Learning 93%
- Unveiling the Clinical Incapabilities: A Benchmarking Study of GPT-4V(ision) for Ophthalmic Multimodal Image Analysis 92%
- Optic nerve tortuosity and displacements during horizontal eye movements in healthy and highly myopic subjects 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.