Back

Modeling EEG Resting-State Brain Dynamics: A proof of concept for clinical studies

Kotz, S. A.; Astudillo, A.; Araya, D.; Dalla Bella, S.; Trujillo-Barreto, N.; El-Deredy, W.

2023-04-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.04.15.536991 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional brain imaging has shown that the awake brain, independent of a task, spontaneously switches between a small set of functional networks. How useful this dynamical view of brain activity is for clinical studies, e.g., as early markers of subsequent structural and/or functional change or for assessing successful training or intervention effects, remains unclear. Core to addressing this question is to assess the robustness and reproducibility of the analysis methods that model, characterize, or infer the features of brain dynamics, and the accuracy by which these features represent and classify specific cognitive or altered cognitive states. This is particularly key given inter- and intra-individual variability and measurement noise. Here we used resting-state EEG from persons with Parkinsons Disease (PD) and healthy matched controls to systematically assess the reliability, robustness, and sensitivity of Hidden semi-Markov models (HsMM). These models are an example of model-based probabilistic methods for Brain-State allocations that are estimated from observed data. The method estimates model parameters, if the M/EEG recording or observations, over the scale of minutes, are emissions from hidden states that persist over short durations, before switching or transitioning to other states. We introduce an analysis pipeline that leads to sets of reproducible features of neurophysiological dynamics at the individual level. These features can be used as discriminatory variables to classify individuals and to evaluate the effect of non-pharmacological training schemes like in the current example a music-gait exercise program for Parkinsons Disease. Given the method stochasticity and the data variability, we emphasize the importance of repeating the analysis to reliably identify brain states and their dynamical trajectories that subsequently can be related to individualized variables.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.