A Systematic Review of the use of Precision Diagnostics in Monogenic Diabetes
Gloyn, A. L.; Murphy, R.; Colclough, K.; Pollin, T.; Ikle, J. M.; Svalastoga, P.; Maloney, K.; Saint-Martin, C.; Molnes, J.; Misra, S.; Aukrust, I.; De Franco, E.; Flanagan, S.; Njolstad, P. R.; Billings, L. K.; Owen, K. R.
Show abstract
Monogenic forms of diabetes present opportunities for precision medicine as identification of the underlying genetic cause has implications for treatment and prognosis. However, genetic testing remains inconsistent across countries and health providers, often resulting in both missed diagnosis and misclassification of diabetes type. One of the barriers to deploying genetic testing is uncertainty over whom to test as the clinical features for monogenic diabetes overlap with those for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In this review, we perform a systematic evaluation of the evidence for the clinical and biochemical criteria used to guide selection of individuals with diabetes for genetic testing and review the evidence for the optimal methods for variant detection in genes involved in monogenic diabetes. In parallel we revisit the current clinical guidelines for genetic testing for monogenic diabetes and provide expert opinion on the interpretation and reporting of genetic tests. We provide a series of recommendations for the field informed by our systematic review, synthesizing evidence, and expert opinion. Finally, we identify major challenges for the field and highlight areas for future research and investment to support wider implementation of precision diagnostics for monogenic diabetes. Plan Language SummarySince monogenic diabetes misclassification can occur and lead to missed opportunities for optimal management, and several diagnostic technologies are available, we systematically review the yield of monogenic diabetes using different criteria to select people with diabetes for genetic testing and the technologies used.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accounting for age-related increases in HbA1c more accurately quantifies risk of Type 1 Diabetes progression in islet autoantibody-positive adults 93%
- Relation of incident Type 1 diabetes to recent COVID-19 infection: cohort study using e-health record linkage in Scotland 92%
- The impact of ancestry on performance of type 1 diabetes genetic risk scores: high discrimination performance is maintained in African ancestry populations, but population specific thresholds may improve risk prediction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Incretin hypersecretion in gestational diabetes mellitus 92%
- Prevalence trends of diabetes subgroups in US: A data-driven analysis spanning three decades from NHANES (1988-2018) 91%
- Prediabetes as a risk factor for all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a prospective analysis of 115,919 adults without diabetes in Mexico City 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic differences in the manifestation of early-onset type 2 diabetes 93%
- Comprehensive validation of fasting- and oral glucose tolerance test-based indices of insulin secretion against gold-standard measures 91%
- Severe COVID-19 and Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Three London Teaching Hospitals 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.