Back

Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation to Reduce Phantom Limb Pain in People with a Transtibial Amputation

Dalrymple, A. N.; Fisher, L. E.; Weber, D. J.

2023-04-17 pain medicine
10.1101/2023.04.13.23288483 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivePhantom limb pain (PLP) is debilitating and affects over 70% of people with lower-limb amputation. Other neuropathic pain conditions correspond with increased spinal excitability, which can be measured using reflexes and F-waves. Spinal cord neuromodulation can be used to reduce neuropathic pain in a variety of conditions and may affect spinal excitability, but has not been extensively used for treating phantom limb pain. Here, we propose using a non-invasive neuromodulation method, transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), to reduce PLP and modulate spinal excitability after transtibial amputation. ApproachWe recruited three participants, two males (5- and 9-years post-amputation, traumatic and alcohol-induced neuropathy) and one female (3 months post-amputation, diabetic neuropathy) for this 5-day study. We measured pain using the McGill Pain Questionnaire, visual analog scale, and pain pressure threshold test. We measured spinal reflex and motoneuron excitability using posterior root-muscle (PRM) reflexes and F-waves, respectively. We delivered tSCS for 30 minutes/day for 5 days. Main ResultsAfter 5 days of tSCS, pain scores decreased by clinically-meaningful amounts for all participants from 34.0{+/-}7.0 to 18.3{+/-}6.8. Two participants had increased pain pressure thresholds across the residual limb (Day 1: 5.4{+/-}1.6 lbf; Day 5: 11.4{+/-}1.0 lbf). F-waves had normal latencies but small amplitudes. PRM reflexes had high thresholds (59.5{+/-}6.1 {micro}C) and low amplitudes, suggesting that in PLP, the spinal cord is hypoexcitable. After 5 days of tSCS, reflex thresholds decreased significantly (38.6{+/-}12.2 {micro}C; p<0.001). SignificanceOverall, limb amputation and PLP may be associated with reduced spinal excitability and tSCS can increase spinal excitability and reduce PLP.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.