Back

Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation to Reduce Phantom Limb Pain in People with a Transtibial Amputation

Dalrymple, A. N.; Fisher, L. E.; Weber, D. J.

2023-04-17 pain medicine
10.1101/2023.04.13.23288483
Show abstract

ObjectivePhantom limb pain (PLP) is debilitating and affects over 70% of people with lower-limb amputation. Other neuropathic pain conditions correspond with increased spinal excitability, which can be measured using reflexes and F-waves. Spinal cord neuromodulation can be used to reduce neuropathic pain in a variety of conditions and may affect spinal excitability, but has not been extensively used for treating phantom limb pain. Here, we propose using a non-invasive neuromodulation method, transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), to reduce PLP and modulate spinal excitability after transtibial amputation. ApproachWe recruited three participants, two males (5- and 9-years post-amputation, traumatic and alcohol-induced neuropathy) and one female (3 months post-amputation, diabetic neuropathy) for this 5-day study. We measured pain using the McGill Pain Questionnaire, visual analog scale, and pain pressure threshold test. We measured spinal reflex and motoneuron excitability using posterior root-muscle (PRM) reflexes and F-waves, respectively. We delivered tSCS for 30 minutes/day for 5 days. Main ResultsAfter 5 days of tSCS, pain scores decreased by clinically-meaningful amounts for all participants from 34.0{+/-}7.0 to 18.3{+/-}6.8. Two participants had increased pain pressure thresholds across the residual limb (Day 1: 5.4{+/-}1.6 lbf; Day 5: 11.4{+/-}1.0 lbf). F-waves had normal latencies but small amplitudes. PRM reflexes had high thresholds (59.5{+/-}6.1 {micro}C) and low amplitudes, suggesting that in PLP, the spinal cord is hypoexcitable. After 5 days of tSCS, reflex thresholds decreased significantly (38.6{+/-}12.2 {micro}C; p<0.001). SignificanceOverall, limb amputation and PLP may be associated with reduced spinal excitability and tSCS can increase spinal excitability and reduce PLP.

Matching journals

1
Pain
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.2%
174× avg
2
The Journal of Pain
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.1%
155× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 42%
12.1%
4
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.1%
117× avg
5
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
83× avg
6
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 31%
5.7%
7
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 28%
3.0%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 29 published papers
Top 0.7%
19× avg
9
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.9%
19× avg
10
Clinical and Translational Science
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.8%
19× avg
11
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Wiley · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.9%
14× avg
12
Brain Sciences
MDPI AG · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.8%
18× avg
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
10× avg
14
Blood Advances
American Society of Hematology · based on 16 published papers
Top 0.8%
18× avg
15
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 9%
2.2× avg
16
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
8.8× avg
17
Journal of Neural Engineering
IOP Publishing · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
18
Neurology
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 38 published papers
Top 6%
3.1× avg
19
Molecular Psychiatry
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 84 published papers
Top 6%
3.2× avg
20
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
7.9× avg
21
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Elsevier BV · based on 19 published papers
Top 4%
6.2× avg
22
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
Top 7%
2.2× avg
23
Social Science & Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 3%
8.2× avg
24
Cerebral Cortex
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
15× avg