Back

Epidemiological and genomic investigation of chikungunya virus in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil, between 2015 and 2018

Moreira, F. R. R.; Menezes, M. T.; Salgado-Benvindo, C.; Whittaker, C.; Cox, V.; Chandradeva, N.; Paula, H. H. S.; Martins, A. F.; Chagas, R. R.; Brasil, R. D. V.; Candido, D. S.; Herlinger, A. L.; Ribeiro, M. O.; Arruda, M. B.; Alvarez, P.; Torres, M. C. P.; Dorigatti, I.; Brady, O.; Voloch, C. M.; Tanuri, A.; Iani, F.; Souza, W. M.; Cardozo, S. V.; Faria, N. R.; Aguiar, R. S.

2023-04-20 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.04.12.23288482 medRxiv
Show abstract

Since 2014, Brazil has experienced an unprecedented epidemic caused by chikungunya virus (CHIKV), with several waves of East-Central-South-African (ECSA) lineage transmission reported across the country. In 2018, Rio de Janeiro state, the third most populous state in Brazil, reported 41% of all chikungunya cases in the country. Here we use evolutionary and epidemiological analysis to estimate the timescale of CHIKV-ECSA-American lineage and its epidemiological patterns in Rio de Janeiro. We show that the CHIKV-ECSA outbreak in Rio de Janeiro derived from two distinct clades introduced from the Northeast region in mid-2015 (clade RJ1, n = 63/67 genomes from Rio de Janeiro) and mid-2017 (clade RJ2, n = 4/67). We detected evidence for positive selection in non-structural proteins linked with viral replication in the RJ1 clade (clade-defining: nsP4-A481D) and the RJ2 clade (nsP1-D351G). Finally, we estimate the CHIKV-ECSAs basic reproduction number (R0) to be between 1.2 to 1.6 and show that its instantaneous reproduction number (Rt) displays a strong seasonal pattern with peaks in transmission coinciding with periods of high Aedes aegypti transmission potential. Our results highlight the need for continued genomic and epidemiological surveillance of CHIKV in Brazil, particularly during periods of high ecological suitability, and show that selective pressures underline the emergence and evolution of the large urban CHIKV-ECSA outbreak in Rio de Janeiro.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
9
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
10
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
12
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.4%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.4%
15
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
18
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
22
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
24
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
26
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
29
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%