Back

Legacy effects of precipitation and land use impact maize growth and microbiome assembly under drought stress

Swift, J. F.; Kolp, M. R.; Carmichael, A.; Ford, N. E.; Hansen, P. M.; Sikes, B. A.; Kleiner, M.; Wagner, M. R.

2023-04-12 plant biology
10.1101/2023.04.11.536405 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsAs the climate changes, plants and their associated microbiomes face greater water limitation and increased frequency of drought. Historical environmental patterns can leave a legacy effect on soil and root-associated microbiomes, but the impact of this conditioning on future drought performance is poorly understood. Precipitation gradients provide a means to assess these legacy effects. MethodsWe collected soil microbiomes from four native prairies across a steep precipitation gradient in Kansas, USA. Seedlings of two Zea mays genotypes were inoculated with each soil microbiome in a factorial drought experiment. We investigated plant phenotypic and root microbiome responses to drought and modeled relationships between plant growth metrics and climatic conditions from the soil microbiome origin sites. ResultsDrought caused plants to accumulate shoot mass more slowly and achieve greater root/shoot mass ratios. Drought restructured the bacterial root-associated microbiome via depletion of Pseudomonadota and enrichment of Actinomycetota, whereas the fungal microbiome was largely unaffected. An environmental legacy effect on prairie soil microbiomes influenced plants drought responses: counterintuitively, prairie soil inocula from historically wetter locations increased shoot biomass under drought more than inocula from historically drier prairie soils. ConclusionWe demonstrated links between soil microbiome legacy effects and plant performance under drought, suggesting that future drying climates may condition soils to negatively impact plant performance.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.