Identification of 1600 replication origins in S. cerevisiae
Foss, E. J.; Lichauco, C.; Gatbonton-Schwager, T.; Lofts, B.; Lao, U.; Bedalov, A.
Show abstract
There are approximately 500 known origins of replication in the yeast genome, and the process by which DNA replication initiates at these locations is well understood. In particular, these sites are made competent to initiate replication by loading of the Mcm replicative helicase prior to the start of S phase; thus, "a site to which MCM is bound in G1" might be considered to provide an operational definition of a replication origin. By fusing a subunit of Mcm to micrococcal nuclease, a technique referred to as "Chromatin Endogenous Cleavage", we previously showed that known origins are typically bound by a single Mcm double hexamer, loaded adjacent to the ARS consensus sequence (ACS). Here we extend this analysis from known origins to the entire genome, identifying candidate Mcm binding sites whose signal intensity varies over at least 3 orders of magnitude. Published data quantifying the production of ssDNA during S phase showed clear evidence of replication initiation among the most abundant 1600 of these sites, with replication activity decreasing in concert with Mcm abundance and disappearing at the limit of detection of ssDNA. Three other hallmarks of replication origins were apparent among the most abundant 5,500 sites. Specifically, these sites (1) appeared in intergenic nucleosome-free regions that were flanked on one or both sides by well-positioned nucleosomes; (2) were flanked by ACSs; and (3) exhibited a pattern of GC skew characteristic of replication initiation. Furthermore, the high resolution of this technique allowed us to demonstrate a strong bias for detecting Mcm double-hexamers downstream rather than upstream of the ACS, which is consistent with the directionality of Mcm loading by Orc that has been observed in vitro. We conclude that, if sites at which Mcm double-hexamers are loaded can function as replication origins, then DNA replication origins are at least 3-fold more abundant than previously assumed, and we suggest that replication may occasionally initiate in essentially every intergenic region. These results shed light on recent reports that as many as 15% of replication events initiate outside of known origins, and this broader distribution of replication origins suggest that S phase in yeast may be less distinct from that in humans than is widely assumed.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanics of DNA Replication and Transcription Guide the Asymmetric Distribution of RNAPol2 and Nucleosomes on Replicated Daughter Genomes 97%
- Spatiotemporal kinetics of CAF-1-dependent chromatin maturation ensures transcription fidelity during S-phase 97%
- Loss of histone H3.3 results in DNA replication defects and altered origin dynamics in C. elegans 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic dissection of transcription start site selection by RNA polymerase II in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 96%
- The cytidine deaminase APOBEC3C has unique sequence and genome feature preferences 96%
- The RSC complex remodels nucleosomes in transcribed coding sequences and promotes transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disruption of origin chromatin structure by helicase activation in the absence of DNA replication 97%
- The LINC complex component Kms1 and CENP-B protein Cbp1 cooperate to enforce faithful homology-directed DNA repair at the nuclear periphery in S. pombe 97%
- Fork Pausing Complex Engages Topoisomerases at the Replisome 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Human DNA replication initiation sites are specified epigenetically by oxidation of 5-methyl-deoxycytidine 96%
- ZNF143 binds DNA and stimulates transcription initiation to activate and repress direct target genes 96%
- Separable functions of Tof1/Timeless in intra-S-checkpoint signalling, replisome stability and DNA topological stress. 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.