Back

Novel technology to develop non-transmissible live influenza virus vaccines through alterations in M2/M42 ion channel expression

Kapczynski, D.; Segovia, K.; Chrzastek, K.; Conceicao, C.; Suarez, D. L.; Vervelde, L.; Digard, P.

2023-04-12 microbiology
10.1101/2023.04.11.536210 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Continued global outbreaks of H5Nx highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIV) have been reported in poultry since the emergence of the Asian Goose/Guangdong lineage of HPAIV H5N1 in 1996. Consequently, vaccines have been developed and employed to protect commercial and non-commercial poultry flocks. However, constant changes in virus immunogenetics makes vaccine candidates that prevent morbidity, mortality, reduce shedding, and prevent transmission a moving target. Here, we tested the effects of disrupting the mRNA splice sites and thus expression of either of the two isoforms of the viral ion channel M2 and M42 expressed by the H5N2 low pathogenic avian influenza virus (LPAIV) progenitor of the 1983 Pennsylvania HPAIV outbreak. Both G52C ({Delta}M2) and G145A ({Delta}M42) versions of the A/chicken/Pennsylvania/1/83 (Ck/Penn) virus replicated well in vitro and in ovo, but showed altered virion morphology, with the G145A virus exhibiting filamentous budding. The G52C and G145A viruses also infected chickens efficiently and stimulated robust immune responses; however, unlike the wild type virus, they did not transmit to naive-contact birds. In protection studies, vaccination of birds with G52C or G145A viruses protected 100% of birds from lethal challenge with homologous and distant heterologous H5 HPAIV strains from North American and Asian lineages and significantly reduced virus shedding compared to controls. Furthermore, the live virus vaccines decreased virus shedding 10,000-fold more than corresponding inactivated forms of the vaccine virus. Taken together, these studies demonstrate a strategy for developing a non-transmittable but highly protective live attenuated virus for AIV.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.